Summary of medicine characteristics - CERDELGA 84 MG HARD CAPSULES
This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions.
1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT
Cerdelga 84 mg hard capsules
2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION
Each capsule contains 84.4 mg of eliglustat (as tartrate).
Excipient(s) with known effect:
Each capsule contains 106 mg lactose (as monohydrate).
For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.
3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM
Hard capsule
Capsule with pearl blue-green opaque cap and pearl white opaque body with “GZ02” printed in black on the body of the capsule. The size of the capsule is ‘size 2’ (dimensions 18.0 × 6.4 mm).
4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS
4.1 Therapeutic indications
Cerdelga is indicated for the long-term treatment of adult patients with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1), who are CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs), intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or extensive metabolisers (EMs).
4.2 Posology and method of administration
Therapy with Cerdelga should be initiated and supervised by a physician knowledgeable in the management of Gaucher disease.
Posology
The recommended dose is 84 mg eliglustat twice daily in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs). The recommended dose is 84 mg eliglustat once daily in CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs).
Missed dose
If a dose is missed, the prescribed dose should be taken at the next scheduled time; the next dose should not be doubled.
Special populations
CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolisers (URMs) and indeterminate metabolisers
Eliglustat should not be used in patients who are CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolisers (URMs) or indeterminate metabolisers (see section 4.4).
Patients with hepatic impairment
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with severe (Child-Pugh class C) hepatic impairment, eliglustat is contraindicated (see sections 4.3 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B), eliglustat is not recommended (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A), no dosage adjustment is required and the recommended dose is 84 mg eliglustat twice daily.
In CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs) with any degree of hepatic impairment, eliglustat is not recommended (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild or moderate hepatic impairment taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor, Cerdelga is contraindicated (see sections 4.3 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment taking a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor or a strong, moderate or weak CYP3A inhibitor, a dose of 84 mg eliglustat once daily should be considered (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
Patients with renal impairment
In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment, no dosage adjustment is required and the recommended dose is 84 mg eliglustat twice daily (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 EMs with end stage renal disease (ESRD), eliglustat is not recommended (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
In CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs) with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment or ESRD, eliglustat is not recommended (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
Elderly
There is limited experience in the treatment of elderly with eliglustat. Data indicates that no dosage adjustment is considered necessary (see sections 5.1 and 5.2).
Paediatric population
The safety and efficacy of Cerdelga in children and adolescents under the age of 18 years has not been established. No data are available.
Method of administration
Cerdelga is to be taken orally. The capsules should be swallowed whole, preferably with water, and should not be crushed, dissolved, or opened.
The capsules may be taken with or without food. Consumption of grapefruit or its juice should be avoided (see section 4.5).
4.3 Contraindications
Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.
Patients who are CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or extensive metabolisers (EMs) taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor concomitantly with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor, and patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs) taking a strong CYP3A inhibitor. Use of Cerdelga under these conditions results in substantially elevated eliglustat plasma concentrations (see section 4.4 and 4.5).
Due to significantly increased eliglustat plasma concentrations, Cerdelga is contraindicated in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with severe hepatic impairment and in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild or moderate hepatic impairment taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).
4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use
Initiation of therapy: CYP2D6 genotyping
Before initiation of treatment with Cerdelga, patients should be genotyped for CYP2D6 to determine the CYP2D6 metaboliser status (see section 4.2, Special populations).
Drug-drug interactions
Cerdelga is contraindicated in patients who are CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or extensive metabolisers (EMs) taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor concomitantly with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor, and in patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs) taking a strong CYP3A inhibitor (see section 4.3).
For use of eliglustat with one strong or moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6 or CYP3A, see section 4.5.
Use of eliglustat with strong CYP3A inducers substantially decreases the exposure to eliglustat, which may reduce the therapeutic effectiveness of eliglustat; therefore concomitant administration is not recommended (see section 4.5).
Patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions
Use of eliglustat in patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions has not been studied during clinical trials. Because eliglustat is predicted to cause mild increases in ECG intervals at substantially elevated plasma concentrations, use of eliglustat should be avoided in patients with cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, recent acute myocardial infarction, bradycardia, heart block, ventricular arrhythmia), long QT syndrome, and in combination with Class IA (e.g. quinidine) and Class III (e.g. amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhythmic medicinal products.
Patients with hepatic impairment
Limited data are available in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate hepatic impairment. Use of eliglustat in these patients is not recommended (see sections 4.2. and 5.2).
Limited or no data are available in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs) with any degree of hepatic impairment. Use of eliglustat in these patients is not recommended (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).
Concomitant use of eliglustat with CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment can result in further elevation of eliglustat plasma concentrations, with the magnitude of the effect depending on the enzyme inhibited and the potency of the inhibitor. In CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment taking a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor or strong, moderate or weak CYP3A inhibitor, a dose of 84 mg eliglustat mg once daily should be considered (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).
Patients with renal impairment
Limited or no data are available in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs), intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs) with ESRD and in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs) with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; use of eliglustat in these patients is not recommended (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).
Monitoring of clinical response
Some treatment-naive patients showed less than 20% spleen volume reduction (suboptimal results) after 9 months of treatment (see section 5.1). For these patients, monitoring for further improvement or an alternative treatment modality should be considered.
For patients with stable disease who switch from enzyme replacement therapy to eliglustat, monitoring for disease progression (e.g. after 6 months with regular monitoring thereafter) should be performed for all disease domains to evaluate disease stability. Reinstitution of enzyme replacement therapy or an alternative treatment modality should be considered in individual patients who have a suboptimal response.
Lactose
Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicine.
4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
Eliglustat is metabolised primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4. Concomitant administration of substances affecting CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 activity may alter eliglustat plasma concentrations. Eliglustat is an inhibitor of P-gp and CYP2D6 in vitro; concomitant administration of eliglustat with P-gp or CYP2D6 substrate substances may increase the plasma concentration of those substances.
The list of substances in section 4.5 is not an inclusive list and the prescriber is advised to consult the SmPC of all other prescribed medicinal products for potential drug-drug interactions with eliglustat.
Agents that may increase eliglustat exposure
Cerdelga is contraindicated in patients who are CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or extensive metabolisers (EMs) taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor concomitantly with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor , and in patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs) taking a strong CYP3A inhibitor (see section 4.3). Use of Cerdelga under these conditions results in substantially elevated eliglustat plasma concentrations.
CYP2D6 inhibitors
In intermediate (IMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs):
After repeated 84 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat in non-PMs, concomitant administration with repeated 30 mg once daily doses of paroxetine, a strong inhibitor of CYP2D6, resulted in a 7.3– and 8.9-fold increase in eliglustat Cmax and AUC0–12, respectively. A dose of eliglustat 84 mg once daily should be considered when a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor (e.g. paroxetine, fluoxetine, quinidine, bupropion) is used concomitantly in IMs and EMs.
At 84 mg twice daily dosing with eliglustat in non-PMs, it is predicted that concomitant use of moderate CYP2D6 inhibitors (e.g. duloxetine, terbinafine, moclobemide, mirabegron, cinacalcet, dronedarone) would increase eliglustat exposure approximately up to 4-fold. Caution should be used with moderate CYP2D6 inhibitors in IMs and EMs.
In extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild or moderate hepatic impairment: see sections 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4.
In extensive metabolisers (EMs) with severe hepatic impairment: see sections 4.2 and 4.3.
CYP3A inhibitors
In intermediate (IMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs) :
After repeated 84 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat in non-PMs, concomitant administration with repeated 400 mg once daily doses of ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A, resulted in a 3.8 and 4.3-fold increase in eliglustat Cmax and
AUC0–12, respectively; similar effects would be expected for other strong inhibitors of CYP3A (e.g. clarithromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, cobicistat, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, telaprevir, tipranavir, posaconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin, conivaptan, boceprevir). Caution should be used with strong CYP3A inhibitors in IMs and EMs.
At 84 mg twice daily dosing with eliglustat in non-PMs, it is predicted that concomitant use of moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, imatinib, cimetidine) would increase eliglustat exposure approximately up to 3-fold. Caution should be used with moderate CYP3A inhibitors in IMs and EMs.
In extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment: see sections 4.2 and 4.4.
In extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate or severe hepatic impairment: see sections 4.2 and 4.3.
In poor metabolisers (PMs):
At 84 mg once daily dosing with eliglustat in PMs, it is predicted that concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. ketoconazole, clarithromycin, itraconazole, cobicistat, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, telaprevir, tipranavir, posaconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin, conivaptan, boceprevir) would increase the Cmax and AUC0–24 of eliglustat 4.3– and 6.2-fold. The use of strong CYP3A inhibitors is contraindicated in PMs.
At 84 mg once daily dosing with eliglustat in PMs, it is predicted that concomitant use of moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, diltiazem, verapamil, aprepitant, atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, imatinib, cimetidine) would increase the Cmax and AUC0–24 of eliglustat 2.4– and 3.0-fold, respectively. Use of a moderate CYP3A inhibitor with eliglustat is not recommended in PMs.
Caution should be used with weak CYP3A inhibitors (e.g. amlodipine, cilostazol, fluvoxamine, goldenseal, isoniazid, ranitidine, ranolazine) in PMs.
CYP2D6 inhibitors used simultaneously with CYP3A inhibitors
In intermediate (IMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs):
At 84 mg twice daily dosing with eliglustat in non-PMs, it is predicted that the concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitors and strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors would increase Cmax and AUC0–12 up to 17– and 25-fold, respectively. The use of a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor concomitantly with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor is contraindicated in IMs and EMs.
Grapefruit products contain one or more components that inhibit CYP3A and can increase plasma concentrations of eliglustat. Consumption of grapefruit or its juice should be avoided.
Agents that may decrease eliglustat exposure
Strong CYP3A inducers
After repeated 127 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat in non-PMs, concomitant administration of repeated 600 mg once daily doses of rifampicin (a strong inducer of CYP3A as well as the efflux transporter P-gp) resulted in an approximately 85% decrease in eliglustat exposure. After repeated 84 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat in PMs, concomitant administration of repeated 600 mg once daily doses of rifampicin resulted in an approximately 95% decrease in eliglustat exposure. Use of a strong CYP3A inducer (e.g. rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifabutin and St. John’s wort) with eliglustat is not recommended in IMs, EMs and PMs.
Agents whose exposure may be increased by eliglustat
P-gp substrates
After a single 0.25 mg dose of digoxin, a P-gp substrate, concomitant administration of 127 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat resulted in a 1.7– and 1.5-fold increase in digoxin Cmax and AUClast, respectively. Lower doses of substances which are P-gp substrates (e.g. digoxin, colchicine, dabigatran, phenytoin, pravastatin) may be required.
CYP2D6 substrates
After a single 50 mg dose of metoprolol, a CYP2D6 substrate, concomitant administration of repeated 127 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat resulted in a 1.5-and 2.1-fold increase in metoprolol Cmax and AUC, respectively. Lower doses of medicinal products that are CYP2D6 substrates may be required. These include certain antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants, e.g. nortriptyline, amitriptyline, imipramine, and desipramine), phenothiazines, dextromethorphan and atomoxetine).
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of eliglustat in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3). As a precautionary measure, it is recommended to avoid the use of Cerdelga during pregnancy.
Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether eliglustat or its metabolites are excreted in human milk.
Available pharmacodynamic/toxicological data in animals have shown excretion of eliglustat in milk (see section 5.3). A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. A decision must be made whether to discontinue breast-feeding or to discontinue/abstain from Cerdelga therapy taking into account the benefit of breast-feeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman.
Fertility
Effects on testes and reversible inhibition of spermatogenesis were observed in rats (see section 5.3). The relevance of these findings for humans is not known.
4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines
Cerdelga has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines.
4.8 Undesirable effects
Summary of the safety profile
The overall adverse reaction profile of Cerdelga is based on 1400 patient-years of treatment exposure and pooled results from the primary analysis periods and extension periods of two pivotal Phase 3 studies (ENGAGE and ENCORE), one 8-year, long term Phase 2 study (Study 304) and one supporting Phase 3b study (EDGE). In these four studies a total of 393 patients between the ages of 16–75 years received eliglustat for a median duration of 3.5 years (up to 9.3 years).
The most frequently reported adverse reaction with Cerdelga is dyspepsia, in approximately 6% of the clinical trial patients.
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
Adverse reactions are ranked by system organ class and frequency ([very common (>1/10); common (>1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000)]). Adverse reactions from long term clinical trial data reported in at least 4 patients are presented in Table 1.Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.
Table 1: Tabulated list of adverse reactions
System Organ Class | Common |
Nervous system disorders | Headache*, dizziness*, dysgeusia |
Cardiac disorders | Palpitations |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Throat irritation |
Gastrointestinal disorders | Dyspepsia, abdominal pain upper*, diarrhoea*, nausea, constipation, abdominal pain*, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, abdominal distension*, gastritis, dysphagia, vomiting*, dry mouth, flatulence |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Dry skin, urticaria* |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Arthralgia, pain in extremity*, back pain* |
General disorders and administration site conditions | Fatigue |
* The incidence of the adverse reaction was the same or higher with placebo than with Cerdelga in the placebo-controlled pivotal study.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system listed below:
United Kingdom
Yellow Card Scheme
Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store
4.9 Overdose
4.9 OverdoseThe highest eliglustat plasma concentration observed to date occurred in a Phase 1 single-dose dose escalation study in healthy subjects, in a subject taking a dose equivalent to approximately 21 times the recommended dose for GD1 patients. At the time of the highest plasma concentration (59-fold higher than normal therapeutic conditions), the subject experienced dizziness marked by disequilibrium, hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting.
In the event of acute overdose, the patient should be carefully observed and given symptomatic treatment and supportive care.
5 PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES
5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other alimentary tract and metabolism products, various alimentary tract and metabolism products, ATC code: A16AX10.
Mechanism of action
Eliglustat is a potent and specific inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, and acts as a substrate reduction therapy (SRT) for GD1. SRT aims to reduce the rate of synthesis of the major substrate glucosylceramide (GL-1) to match its impaired rate of catabolism in patients with GD1, thereby preventing glucosylceramide accumulation and alleviating clinical manifestations.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In clinical trials in treatment-naive GDI patients, plasma GL-1 levels were elevated in the majority of these patients and decreased upon Cerdelga treatment. Additionally, in a clinical trial in GD1 patients stabilised on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) (i.e. having already achieved therapeutic goals on ERT prior to initiating Cerdelga treatment), plasma GL-1 levels were normal in most patients and decreased upon Cerdelga treatment.
Clinical efficacy and safety
The recommended dosing regimens (see section 4.2) are based on modelling, either of PK/PD data from the dose-titration regimens applied in the clinical studies for IMs and EMs, or physiologically-based PK data for PMs.
Pivotal study of Cerdelga in treatment-naive GDI patients – study 02507(ENGAGE)
Study 02507 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study in 40 patients with GD1. In the Cerdelga group 3 (15%) patients received a starting dose of 42 mg eliglustat twice daily during the 9-month primary analysis period and 17 (85%) patients received a dose escalation to 84 mg twice daily based on plasma trough concentration.
Table 2: Change from baseline to Month 9 (primary analysis period) in treatment-naive patients with GDI receiving treatment with Cerdelga in study 02507
Placebo* (n=20) a | Cerdelga (n=20) a | Difference (Cerdelga -Placebo) [95% CI] | p valueb | |
Percentage Change in Spleen Volume MN (%) (primary endpoint) | 2.26 | –27.77 | –30.0 [-36.8, –23.2] | <0.0001 |
Absolute Change in Haemoglobin Level (g/dL) (secondary endpoint) | –0.54 | 0.69 | 1.22 [0.57, 1.88] | 0.0006 |
Percentage Change in Liver Volume MN (%) (secondary endpoint) | 1.44 | –5.20 | –6.64 [-11.37, –1.91] | 0.0072 |
Percentage Change in Platelet Count (%) (secondary endpoint) | –9.06 | 32.00 | 41.06 [23.95, 58.17] | <0.0001 |
MN = Multiples of Normal, CI = confidence interval
a At baseline, mean spleen volumes were 12.5 and 13.9 MN in the placebo and Cerdelga groups, respectively, and mean liver volumes were 1.4 MN for both groups. Mean haemoglobin levels were 12.8 and 12.1 g/dL, and platelet counts were 78.5 and 75.1 × 109/L, respectively.
b Estimates and p-values are based on an ANCOVA model
* All patients transitioned to Cerdelga treatment after Month 9.
During the open-label long term treatment period with Cerdelga (extension phase), all patients with complete data who continued to receive Cerdelga showed further improvements throughout the extension phase. Results (change from baseline) after 18 months, 30 months and 4.5 years of exposure to Cerdelga on the following endpoints were: absolute change in haemoglobin level (g/dL) 1.1 (1.03) [n=39], 1.4 (0.93) [n=35], and 1.4 (1.31) [n=12]; mean increase in platelet count (mm3) 58. 5% (40.57%) [n=39], 74.6% (49.57%) [n=35], and 86.8% (54.20%) [n=12]; mean reduction in spleen volume (MN) 46.5% (9.75%) [n=38], 54.2% (9.51%) [n=32], and 65.6% (7.43%) [n=13]; and mean reduction in liver volume (MN) 13.7% (10.65%) [n=38], 18.5% (11.22%) [n=32], and 23.4% (10.59%) [n=13].
Long-term clinical outcomes in treatment-naive GDI patients – study 304
Study 304 was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study of Cerdelga in 26 patients. Nineteen patients completed 4 years of treatment. Fifteen (79%) of these patients received a dose escalation to 84 mg eliglustat twice daily; 4 (21%) patients continued to receive 42 mg twice daily.
Eighteen patients completed 8 years of treatment. One patient (6%) received a further dose escalation to 127 mg twice daily. Fourteen (78%) continued on 84 mg Cerdelga twice daily. Three (17%) patients continued to receive 42 mg twice daily. Sixteen patients had an efficacy endpoint assessment at year 8.
Cerdelga showed sustained improvements in organ volume and haematological parameters over the 8 year treatment period (see Table 3).
Table 3: Change from baseline to year 8 in study 304
N | Baseline Value (Mean) | Change from Baseline (Mean) | Standard Deviation | |
Spleen Volume (MN) | 15 | 17.34 | –67.9% | 17.11 |
Haemoglobin Level (g/dL) | 16 | 11.33 | 2.08 | 1.75 |
Liver Volume (MN) | 15 | 1.60 | –31.0% | 13.51 |
Platelet Count (x109/L) | 16 | 67.53 | 109.8% | 114.73 |
MN = Multiples of N | ormal |
Pivotal study of Cerdelga in GDI patients switching from ERT- Study 02607 (ENCORE)
Study 02607 was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter clinical study in 159 patients previously stabilised with ERT. In the Cerdelga group 34 (32%) patients received a dose escalation to 84 mg eliglustat twice daily and 51 (48%) to 127 mg twice daily during the 12-month primary analysis period , and 21 (20%) patients continued to receive 42 mg twice daily.
Based on the aggregate data from all doses tested in this study, Cerdelga met the criteria set in this study to be declared non-inferior to Cerezyme (imiglucerase) in maintaining patient stability. After 12 months of treatment, the percentage of patients meeting the primary composite endpoint (composed of all four components mentioned in Table 4) was 84.8% [95% confidence interval 76.2% – 91.3%] for the Cerdelga group compared to 93.6% [95% confidence interval 82.5% – 98.7 %] for the Cerezyme group. Of the patients who did not meet stability criteria for the individual components, 12 of 15 Cerdelga patients and 3 of 3 Cerezyme patients remained within therapeutic goals for GD1.
There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups for any of the four individual disease parameters (see Table 4).
Table 4: Changes from baseline to Month 12 (primary analysis period) in patients with GD1 switching to Cerdelga in study 02607
Cerezyme (N=47)** Mean [95% CI] | Cerdelga (N=99) Mean [95% CI] | |
Spleen Volume | ||
Percentage of Patients with stable spleen volume*a | 100% | 95.8% |
Percentage Change in Spleen Volume MN (%) | –3.01 [-6.41, 0.40] | –6.17 [-9.54, –2.79] |
Haemoglobin Level | ||
Percentage of Patients with stable haemoglobin levela | 100% | 94.9% |
Absolute Change in Haemoglobin Level (g/dL) | 0.038 [-0.16, 0.23] | –0.21 [-0.35, –0.07] |
Liver Volume | ||
Percentage of Patients with stable liver volumea | 93.6% | 96.0% |
Percentage Change in Liver Volume MN (%) | 3.57 [0.57, 6.58] | 1.78 [-0.15, 3.71] |
Platelet Count | ||
Percentage of Patients with stable platelet counta | 100% | 92.9% |
Percentage Change in Platelet Count (%) | 2.93 [-0.56, 6.42] | 3.79 [0.01, 7.57] |
MN = Multiples of Normal, CI = confidence interval
Excludes patients with a total splenectomy.
* * All patients transitioned to Cerdelga treatment after 52 weeks
a The stability criteria based on changes between baseline and 12 months: haemoglobin level <1.5 g/dL decrease, platelet count <25% decrease, liver volume <20% increase, and spleen volume <25% increase.
All patient number (N)= Per Protocol Population
During the open-label long term treatment period with Cerdelga (extension phase) the percentage of patients with complete data meeting the composite stability endpoint was maintained at 84.6% (n=136) after 2 years, 84.4% (n=109) after 3 years and 91.1% (n=45) after 4 years. The majority of extension phase discontinuations were due to transition to commercial product from year 3 onwards. Individual disease parameters of spleen volume, liver volume, haemoglobin levels and platelet count remained stable through 4 years (see Table 5).
Table 5: Changes from Month 12 (primary analysis period) to Month 48 in patients with GD1 in the Long Term Treatment Period on Cerdelga in study 02607
Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||
Cerezyme /Cerdelga11 Mean [95% CI] | Cerdelgab Mean [95% CI]) | Cerezyme /Cerdelgaa Mean [95% CI] | Cerdelgab Mean [95% CI] | Cerezyme /Cerdelgaa Mean [95% CI] | Cerdelgab Mean [95% CI] | |
Patients at start of year (N) | 51 | 101 | 46 | 98 | 42 | 96 |
Patients at end of year (N) | 46 | 98 | 42 | 96 | 21 | 44 |
Patients with available data (N) | 39 | 97 | 16 | 93 | 3 | 42 |
Spleen Volume | ||||||
Patients with stable spleen volume (%) | 31/33 (93.9) [0.798, 0.993] | 69/72 (95.8) [0.883, 0.991] | 12/12 (100.0) [0.735, 1.000] | 65/68 (95.6) [0.876, 0.991] | 2/2 (100.0) [0.158, 1.000] | 28/30 (93.3) [0.779, 0.992] |
Change in Spleen Volume MN (%) | –3.946[-8.80, 0.91] | –6.814[-10.61, – 3.02] | –10.267[-20.12, –0.42] | –7.126[-11.70, – 2.55] | –27.530[-89.28, 34.22] | –13.945[-20.61, –7.28] |
Haemoglobin Level | ||||||
Patients with stable haemoglobin level (%) | 38/39 (97.4) [0.865, 0.999] | 95/97 (97.9) [0.927, 0.997] | 16/16 (100.0) [0.794, 1.000] | 90/93 (96.8) [0.909, 0.993] | 3/3 (100.0) (0.292, 1.000] | 42/42 (100.0) [0.916, 1.000] |
Change from baseline in Haemoglobin Level (g/dL) | 0.034[-0.31, 0.38] | –0.112[-0.26, 0.04] | 0.363[-0.01, 0.74] | –0.103[-0.27, 0.07] | 0.383[-1.62, 2.39] | 0.290[0.06, 0.53] |
Liver Volume | ||||||
Patients with stable liver volume (%) | 38/39 (97.4) (0.865, 0.999) | 94/97 (96.9) (0.912, 0.994) | 15/16 (93.8) [0.698, 0.998] | 87/93 (93.5) (0.865, 0.976) | 3/3 (100.0) [0.292, 1.000] | 40/42 (95.2) [0.838, 0.994] |
Change from baseline in Liver Volume MN (%) | 0.080[-3.02, 3.18] | 2.486[0.50, 4.47] | –4.908[-11.53, 1.71] | 3.018[0.52, 5.52] | –14.410[-61.25, 32.43] | –1.503[-5.27, 2.26] |
Platelet Count | ||||||
Patients with stable platelet count (%) | 33/39 (84.6) [0.695, 0.941] | 92/97 (94.8) [0.884, 0.983] | 13/16 (81.3) [0.544, 0.960] | 87/93 (93.5) [0.865, 0.976] | 3/3 (100.0) [0.292, 1.000] | 40/42 (95.2) [0.838, 0.994] |
Change in Platelet Count (%) | –0.363[-6.60, 5.88] | 2.216[-1.31, 5.74] | 0.719[-8.20, 9.63] | 5.403[1.28, 9.52] | –0.163[-35.97, 35.64] | 7.501[1.01, 13.99] |
Composite Stability Endpoint | ||||||
Patients who are Stable on Cerdelga (%) | 30/39 (76.9) [0.607, 0.889] | 85/97 (87.6) [0.794, 0.934] | 12/16 (75.0) [0.476, 0.927] | 80/93 (86.0) [0.773, 0.923] | 3/3 (100.0) [0.292, 1.000] | 38/42 (90.5) [0.774, 0.973] |
MN = Multiples of Normal, CI = confidence interval
* Excludes patients with a total splenectomy.
a Cerezyme/Cerdelga – Originally Randomized to Cerezyme
b Cerdelga – Originally Randomized to Cerdelga
Clinical experience in CYP2D6 poor metabolisers (PMs) and ultra-rapid metabolisers (URMs)
There is limited experience with Cerdelga treatment of patients who are PMs or URMs. In the primary analysis periods of the three clinical studies, a total of 5 PMs and 5 URMs were treated with Cerdelga. All PMs received 42 mg eliglustat twice daily, and four of these (80%) had an adequate clinical response. The majority of URMs (80%) received a dose escalation to 127 mg eliglustat twice daily, all of which had adequate clinical responses. The one URM who received 84 mg twice daily did not have an adequate response.
The predicted exposures with 84 mg eliglustat once daily in patients who are PMs are expected to be similar to exposures observed with 84 mg eliglustat twice daily in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs). Patients who are URMs may not achieve adequate concentrations to achieve a therapeutic effect. No dosing recommendation for URMs can be given.
Effects on skeletal pathology
After 9 months of treatment, in Study 02507, bone marrow infiltration by Gaucher cells, as determined by the total Bone Marrow Burden (BMB) score (assessed by MRI in lumbar spine and femur) decreased by a mean of 1.1 points in Cerdelga treated patients (n=19) compared to no change in patients receiving placebo (n=20). Five Cerdelga-treated patients (26%) achieved a reduction of at least 2 points in the BMB score.
After 18 and 30 months of treatment, BMB score had decreased by a mean 2.2 points (n=18) and 2.7 (n=15), respectively for the patients originally randomised to Cerdelga, compared to a mean decrease of 1 point (n=20) and 0.8 (n=16) in those originally randomised to placebo.
After 18 months of Cerdelga treatment in the open-label extension phase, the mean (SD) lumbar spine Bone Mineral Density T-score increased from –1.14 (1.0118) at Baseline (n=34) to –0.918 (1.1601) (n=33) in the normal range. After 30 months and 4.5 years of treatment, the T-score further increased to –0.722 (1.1250) (n=27) and –0.533 (0.8031) (n=9), respectively.
Results of study 304 indicate that skeletal improvements are maintained or continue to improve during at least 8 years of treatment with Cerdelga.
In study 02607, lumbar spine and femur BMD T- and Z-scores were maintained within the normal range in patients treated with Cerdelga for up to 4 years.
Electrocardiographic evaluation
No clinically significant QTc prolonging effect of eliglustat was observed for single doses up to 675 mg.
Heart-rate corrected QT interval using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) was evaluated in a randomized, placebo and active (moxifloxacin 400 mg) controlled cross-over, single-dose study in 47 healthy subjects. In this trial with demonstrated ability to detect small effects, the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the largest placebo-adjusted, baseline-corrected QTcF was below 10 msec, the threshold for regulatory concern. While there was no apparent effect on heart rate, concentration-related increases were observed for the placebo corrected change from baseline in the PR, QRS, and QTc intervals. Based on PK/PD modelling, eliglustat plasma concentrations 11-fold the predicted human Cmax are expected to cause mean (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval) increases in the PR, QRS, and QTcF intervals of 18.8 (20.4), 6.2 (7.1), and 12.3 (14.2) msec, respectively.
Elderly
A limited number of patients aged 65 years (n=10) and over were enrolled in clinical trials. No significant differences were found in the efficacy and safety profiles of elderly patients and younger patients.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Cerdelga in all subsets of the paediatric population in Gaucher disease Type 2 (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Cerdelga in the subsets of the paediatric population from 24 months to less than 18 years in Gaucher disease Type 1 and Type 3 (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties
Absorption
Median time to reach maximum plasma concentrations occurs between 1.5 to 6 hours after dosing, with low oral bioavailability (<5%) due to significant first-pass metabolism. Eliglustat is a substrate of the efflux transporter P-gp. Food does not have a clinically relevant effect on eliglustat pharmacokinetics. Following repeated dosing of eliglustat 84 mg twice daily in non-PMs and once daily in PMs, steady state was reached by 4 days, with an accumulation ratio of 3-fold or less.
Distribution
Eliglustat is moderately bound to human plasma proteins (76 to 83%) and is mainly distributed in plasma. After intravenous administration, the volume of distribution was 816 L, suggesting wide distribution to tissues in humans. Nonclinical studies demonstrated a wide distribution of eliglustat to tissues, including bone marrow.
Biotransformation
Eliglustat is extensively metabolized with high clearance, mainly by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent CYP3A4. Primary metabolic pathways of eliglustat involve sequential oxidation of the octanoyl moiety followed by oxidation of the 2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxane moiety, or a combination of the two pathways, resulting in multiple oxidative metabolites.
Elimination
After oral administration, the majority of the administered dose is excreted in urine (41.8%) and faeces (51.4%), mainly as metabolites. After intravenous administration, eliglustat total body clearance was 86 L/h. After repeated oral doses of 84 mg eliglustat twice daily, eliglustat elimination half-life is approximately 47 hours in non-PMs and 9 hours in PMs.
Characteristics in specific groups
CYP2D6 phenotype
Population pharmacokinetic analysis shows that the CYP2D6 predicted phenotype based on genotype is the most important factor affecting pharmacokinetic variability. Individuals with a CYP2D6 poor metaboliser predicted phenotype (approximately 5 to 10% of the population) exhibit higher eliglustat concentrations than intermediate or extensive CYP2D6 metabolisers.
Gender, body weight, age, and race
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, gender, body weight, age, and race had limited or no impact on the pharmacokinetics of eliglustat.
Hepatic impairment:
Effects of mild and moderate hepatic impairment were evaluated in a single dose phase 1 study. After a single 84 mg dose, eliglustat Cmax and AUC were 1.2– and 1.2-fold higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment, and 2.8– and 5.2-fold higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs).
After repeated 84 mg twice daily doses of Cerdelga, Cmax and AUC0–12 are predicted to be 2.4– and 2.9-fold higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with mild hepatic impairment and 6.4– and 8.9-fold higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs).
After repeated 84 mg once daily doses of Cerdelga, Cmax and AUC0–24 are predicted to be 3.1– and 3.2 -fold higher in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs ) receiving Cerdelga 84 mg twice daily (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Steady state PK exposure could not be predicted in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) with mild and moderate hepatic impairment due to limited or no single-dose data. The effect of severe hepatic impairment was not studied in subjects with any CYP2D6 phenotype (see sections 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4).
Renal impairment:
Effect of severe renal impairment was evaluated in a single dose phase 1 study. After a single 84 mg dose, eliglustat Cmax and AUC were similar in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with severe renal impairment and healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers (EMs).
Limited or no data were available in patients with ESRD and in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers (IMs) or poor metabolisers(PMs) with severe renal impairment (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
5.3 Preclinical safety data
6 PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS
6.1 List of excipients
Capsule contents
Microcrystalline cellulose
Lactose monohydrate
Hypromellose
Glycerol dibehenate
Capsule shell
Gelatin
Potassium aluminium silicate (E555)
Titanium dioxide (E171)
Yellow iron oxide (E172)
Indigotine (E132)
Printing ink
Shellac
Black iron oxide (E172)
Propylene glycol
Ammonia solution, concentrated
6.2 Incompatibilities
Not applicable.
6.3 Shelf life
3 years
6.4 Special precautions for storage
This medicinal product does not require any special storage conditions.
6.5 Nature and contents of container
PETG/COC.PETG/PCTFE-aluminium blister
Each blister wallets contains 14 hard capsules.
Each pack contains 14, 56 or 196 hard capsules.
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.
6.6 Special precautions for disposal
6.6 Special precautions for disposalAny unused product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.
7 MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDER
Aventis Pharma Ltd
410 Thames Valley Park Drive
Reading
Berkshire
RG6 1PT
UK
Trading as:
Sanofi Genzyme
410 Thames Valley Park Drive
Reading
Berkshire
RG6 1PT
UK
8 MARKETING AUTHORISATION NUMBER(S)
PLGB 04425/0763
9 DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION/RENEWAL OF THE AUTHORISATION
01/01/2021