RIVASTIGMINE LUYE TWICE WEEKLY 4.6 MG / 24 H TRANSDERMAL PATCH - summary of medicine characteristics

1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT

Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patch

2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

Each transdermal patch releases 4.6 mg of rivastigmine per 24 hours. Each transdermal patch of

10.8 cm2 contains 25.92 mg of rivastigmine.

For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM

Transdermal patch

Each transdermal patch is a thin, matrix-type transdermal patch of a rectangular shape. The outside of the backing layer is translucent.

Each patch is printed in blue with: RID-TDS 4.6 mg/24 h

4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS

4.1 Therapeutic indications

Symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s de­mentia.

4.2 Posology and method of administration

Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patches should be applied twice weekly on fixed days (after four and three days, respectively) (please see also Method of administration). Treatment should be initiated and supervised by a physician experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s de­mentia. Diagnosis should be made according to current guidelines. Similar to any treatment initiated in patients with dementia, therapy with rivastigmine should only be started if a caregiver is available to regularly administer and monitor the treatment.

Posology

Initial dose

Treatment is started with 4.6 mg/24 h.

Maintenance dose

After a minimum of four weeks of treatment and if well tolerated according to the treating physician, the dose of 4.6 mg/24 h should be increased to 9.5 mg/24 h, the daily recommended effective dose, which should be continued for as long as the patient continues to demonstrate therapeutic benefit.

Dose escalation

9.5 mg/24 h is the recommended daily effective dose which should be continued for as long as the patient continues to demonstrate therapeutic benefit. If well tolerated and only after a minimum of six months of treatment at 9.5 mg/24 h, the treating physician may consider increasing the dose to 13.3 mg/24 h in patients who have demonstrated a meaningful cognitive deterioration (e.g. decrease in the MMSE) and/or functional decline (based on physician judgement) while on the recommended daily effective dose of 9.5 mg/24 h (see section 5.1).

The 13.3 mg/24 h dose strength cannot be achieved with Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly. For conditions where this strength should be used, other rivastigmine containing transdermal patches of the 13.3 mg/24 h strength are available.

The clinical benefit of rivastigmine should be reassessed on a regular basis. Discontinuation should also be considered when evidence of a therapeutic effect at the optimal dose is no longer present.

Treatment should be temporarily interrupted if gastrointestinal adverse reactions are observed until these adverse reactions resolve. Transdermal patch treatment can be resumed at the same dose if treatment is not interrupted for more than three days. Otherwise treatment should be re-initiated with 4.6 mg/24 h.

Switching from capsules or oral solution to transdermal patches

Based on comparable exposure between oral and transdermal rivastigmine (see section 5.2), patients treated with rivastigmine capsules or oral solution can be switched to Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patches as follows: A patient on a dose of 3 mg/day oral rivastigmine can be switched to 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patches.

A patient on a dose of 6 mg/day oral rivastigmine can be switched to 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patches.

A patient on a stable and well tolerated dose of 9 mg/day oral rivastigmine can be switched to 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patches. If the oral dose of 9 mg/day has not been stable and well tolerated, a switch to 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patches is recommended.

A patient on a dose of 12 mg/day oral rivastigmine can be switched to 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patches.

After switching to 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patches, provided these are well tolerated after a minimum of four weeks of treatment, the dose of 4.6 mg/24 h should be increased to 9.5 mg/24 h, which is the recommended effective dose.

It is recommended to apply the first transdermal patch on the day following the last oral dose.

Special populations

Paediatric population: There is no relevant use of rivastigmine in the paediatric population in the treatment of Alzheimer’s di­sease.

Patients with body weight below 50 kg: Particular caution should be exercised in titrating patients with body weight below 50 kg above the recommended effective dose of 9.5 mg/24 h (see section 4.4). They may experience more adverse reactions and may be more likely to discontinue due to adverse reactions.

Hepatic impairment: Due to increased exposure in mild to moderate hepatic impairment as observed with the oral formulation, dosing recommendations to titrate according to individual tolerability should be closely followed. Patients with clinically significant hepatic impairment may experience more dosedependent adverse reactions. Patients with severe hepatic impairment have not been studied. Particular caution should be exercised in titrating these patients (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).

Renal impairment: No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with renal impairment (see section 5.2).

Method of administration

Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly is for transdermal use.

Transdermal patches should be applied twice weekly on fixed days (after four and three days, respectively) to clean, dry, hairless, intact healthy skin on the upper or lower back, upper arm or chest, in a place which will not be rubbed by tight clothing. It is not recommended to apply the transdermal patch to the thigh or to the abdomen due to decreased bioavailability of rivastigmine observed when the transdermal patch is applied to these areas of the body.

The transdermal patch should not be applied to skin that is red, irritated or cut. Reapplication to the exact same skin location within 14 days should be avoided to minimise the potential risk of skin irritation.

To prevent interference with the adhesive properties of the transdermal patch, no cream, lotion or powder should be applied to the skin area where the medicinal product is to be applied.

The pack contains for each application a rectangular, translucent transdermal patch and an oval, beige adhesive cover.

Both patches are individually sealed in sachets. The adhesive cover is exclusively used for fixation of the transdermal patch.

The previous patch must be removed before applying a new one (see section 4.9).

The patch should be replaced by a new one latest after 4 days. Only one patch should be worn at a time (see section 4.9).

The patch should be pressed down firmly for approx. 15 seconds using the palm of the hand until the edges stick well. Then it is covered with the adhesive cover and pressed down firmly for at least 30 seconds using the palm of the hand until it sticks well.

If the patch falls off, a new one should be applied and be replaced at the same time as usual.

The patch can be used in everyday situations, including bathing and during hot weather.

The patch should not be exposed to any external heat sources (e.g. excessive sunlight, saunas, solarium) for long periods of time.

The transdermal patch as well as the adhesive cover should not be cut into pieces.

4.3 Contraindications

Hypersensitivity to the active substance rivastigmine, to other carbamate derivatives or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.

Previous history of application site reactions suggestive of allergic contact dermatitis with rivastigmine patch (see section 4.4).

4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use

Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patches are multiday patches. Care should be exercised and application of more than one patch at the same time should be avoided.The incidence and severity of adverse reactions generally increase with increasing doses, particularly

at dose changes. If treatment is interrupted for more than three days, it should be reinitiated with

4.6 mg/24 h.

Misuse of the medicinal product and dosing errors resulting in overdose

Misuse of the medicinal product and dosing errors with rivastigmine transdermal patch have resulted in serious adverse reactions; some cases have required hospitalisation, and rarely led to death (see section 4.9). Most cases of misuse of the medicinal product and dosing errors have involved not removing the old patch when putting on a new one and the use of multiple patches at the same time. Patients and their caregivers must be instructed on important administration instructions for rivastigmine transdermal patch (see section 4.2).

Gastrointestinal disorders

Gastrointestinal disorders such as nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are dose-related, and may occur when initiating treatment and/or increasing the dose (see section 4.8). These adverse reactions occur more commonly in women. Patients who show signs or symptoms of dehydration resulting from prolonged vomiting or diarrhoea can be managed with intravenous fluids and dose reduction or discontinuation if recognised and treated promptly. Dehydration can be associated with serious outcomes.

Weight loss

Patients with Alzheimer’s disease may lose weight whilst taking cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine. The patient’s weight should be monitored during therapy with rivastigmine transdermal patches.

Bradycardia

Rivastigmine may cause bradycardia which constitutes a risk factor in the occurrence of torsade de pointes, predominantly in patients with risk factors. Caution is advised in patients at higher risk of developing torsade de pointes; for example, those with uncompensated heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, bradyarrhythmias, a predisposition to hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia, or concomitant use with medicinal products known to induce QT prolongation and/or torsade de pointes (see sections 4.5 and 4.8).

Other adverse reactions

Care must be taken when prescribing Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patches:

to patients with sick sinus syndrome or conduction defects (sino-atrial block, atrio-ventricular block) (see section 4.8);

to patients with active gastric or duodenal ulcers or patients predisposed to these conditions because rivastigmine may cause increased gastric secretions (see section 4.8);

to patients predisposed to urinary obstruction and seizures because cholinomimetics may induce or exacerbate these diseases;

to patients with a history of asthma or obstructive pulmonary disease.

Skin application site reactions

Skin application site reactions may occur with rivastigmine patch and are usually mild or moderate in intensity. Patients and caregivers should be instructed accordingly.

These reactions are not in themselves an indication of sensitisation. However, use of rivastigmine patch may lead to allergic contact dermatitis.

Allergic contact dermatitis should be suspected if application site reactions spread beyond the patch size, if there is evidence of a more intense local reaction (e.g. increasing erythema, oedema, papules, vesicles) and if symptoms do not significantly improve within 48 hours after patch removal. In these cases, treatment should be discontinued (see section 4.3).

Patients who develop application site reactions suggestive of allergic contact dermatitis to rivastigmine patch and who still require rivastigmine treatment should only be switched to oral rivastigmine after negative allergy testing and under close medical supervision. It is possible that some patients sensitised to rivastigmine by exposure to rivastigmine patch may not be able to take rivastigmine in any form.

There have been rare post-marketing reports of patients experiencing allergic dermatitis (disseminated) when administered rivastigmine irrespective of the route of administration (oral, transdermal). In these cases, treatment should be discontinued (see section 4.3).

Other warnings and precautions

Rivastigmine may exacerbate or induce extrapyramidal symptoms.

Contact with the eyes should be avoided after handling Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patches (see section 5.3). Hands should be washed with soap and water after removing the patch. In case of contact with eyes or if the eyes become red after handling the patch, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice if symptoms do not resolve.

Special populations

Patients with body weight below 50 kg may experience more adverse reactions and may be more likely to discontinue due to adverse reactions (see section 4.2). Carefully titrate and monitor these patients for adverse reactions (e.g. excessive nausea or vomiting) and consider reducing the maintenance dose to the 4.6 mg/24 h transdermal patch if such adverse reactions develop.

Hepatic impairment: Patients with clinically significant hepatic impairment may experience more adverse reactions. Dosing recommendations to titrate according to individual tolerability must be closely followed. Patients with severe hepatic impairment have not been studied. Particular caution must be exercised in titrating these patients (see sections 4.2 and 5.2).

4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

No specific interaction studies have been performed with rivastigmine transdermal patches.

As a cholinesterase inhibitor, rivastigmine may exaggerate the effects of succinylcholine-type muscle relaxants during anaesthesia. Caution is recommended when selecting anaesthetic agents. Possible dose adjustments or temporarily stopping treatment can be considered if needed.

In view of its pharmacodynamic effects and possible additive effects, rivastigmine should not be given concomitantly with other cholinomimetic substances.

Rivastigmine might interfere with the activity of anticholinergic medicinal products (e.g. oxybutynin, tolterodine).

Additive effects leading to bradycardia (which may result in syncope) have been reported with the combined use of various beta-blockers (including atenolol) and rivastigmine. Cardiovascular betablockers are expected to be associated with the greatest risk, but reports have also been received in patients using other beta-blockers. Therefore, caution should be exercised when rivastigmine is combined with betablockers and also other bradycardia medicinal products (e.g.class III antiarrhythmic medicinal products, calcium channel antagonists, digitalis glycoside, pilocarpin).

Since bradycardia constitutes a risk factor in the occurrence of torsades de pointes, the combination of rivastigmine with torsades de pointes-inducing medicinal products such as antipsychotics i.e. some phenothiazines (chlorpromazine, levomepromazine), benzamides (sulpiride, sultopride, amisulpride, tiapride, veralipride), pimozide, haloperidol, droperidol, cisapride, citalopram, diphemanil, erythromycin IV, halofantrin, mizolastin, methadone, pentamidine and moxifloxacine should be observed with caution and clinical monitoring (ECG) may also be required.

No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between oral rivastigmine and digoxin, warfarin, diazepam or fluoxetine in studies in healthy volunteers. The increase in prothrombin time induced by warfarin is not affected by administration of oral rivastigmine. No untoward effects on cardiac conduction were observed following concomitant administration of digoxin and oral rivastigmine.

Concomitant administration of rivastigmine with commonly prescribed medicinal products, such as antacids, antiemetics, antidiabetics, centrally acting antihypertensives, calcium channel blockers, inotropic medicinal products, antianginals, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicinal products, oestrogens, analgesics, benzodiazepines and antihistamines, was not associated with an alteration in the kinetics of rivastigmine or an increased risk of clinically relevant untoward effects.

According to its metabolism, metabolic interactions with other medicinal products appear unlikely, although rivastigmine may inhibit the butyrylcholines­terase mediated metabolism of other substances.

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Pregnancy

In pregnant animals, rivastigmine and /or metabolites crossed the placenta. It is not known if this occurs in humans. No clinical data on exposed pregnancies are available. In peri/postnatal studies in rats, an increased gestation time was observed. Rivastigmine should not be used during pregnancy unless clearly necessary.

Breast feeding

In animals, rivastigmine is excreted in milk. It is not known if rivastigmine is excreted into human milk. Therefore, women on rivastigmine should not breast-feed.

Fertility

No adverse effects of rivastigmine were observed on fertility or reproductive performance in rats (see section 5.3). Effects of rivastigmine on human fertility are not known.

4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines

Alzheimer’s disease may cause gradual impairment of driving performance or compromise the ability to use machines. Furthermore, rivastigmine may induce syncope or delirium. As a consequence, rivastigmine has minor or moderate influence on the ability to drive and use machines. Therefore, in patients with dementia treated with rivastigmine, the ability to continue driving or operating complex machines should be routinely evaluated by the treating physician.

4.8 Undesirable effects

Summary of the safety profile

Application site skin reactions (usually mild to moderate application site erythema), are the most frequent adverse reactions observed with the use of rivastigmine transdermal patch. The next most common adverse reactions are gastrointestinal in nature including nausea and vomiting.

Adverse reactions in Table 1 are listed according to MedDRA system organ class and frequency category. Frequency categories are defined using the following convention: very common (>1/10); common (>1/100 to <1/10); uncommon (>1/1,000 to <1/100); rare (>1/10,000 to <1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000); not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

Table 1 displays the adverse reactions reported in 1,670 patients with Alzheimer’s de­mentia treated in randomised, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled clinical studies with rivastigmine transdermal patches for a duration of 24–48 weeks and from post-marketing data.

Table 1

Description of selected adverse reactions

When doses higher than 13.3 mg/24 h were used in the above-mentioned placebo-controlled study, insomnia and cardiac failure were observed more frequently than with 13.3 mg/24 h or placebo, suggesting a dose effect relationship. However, these events did not occur at a higher frequency with rivastigmine 13.3 mg/24 h transdermal patches than with placebo.

The following adverse reactions have only been observed with rivastigmine capsules and oral solution and not in clinical studies with rivastigmine transdermal patches: malaise, confusion, sweating increased (common); duodenal ulcers, angina pectoris (rare); gastrointestinal haemorrhage (very rare); and some cases of severe vomiting were associated with oesophageal rupture (not known).

Skin irritation

In a comparative bioavailability study performed with multiple patch applications (over a period of 11 days) to 58 healthy male subjects aged between 18 and 50 years, most of the observed application site reactions were rated with score 1 (“minimal erythema, barely perceptible”) and score 2 (“definite erythema, readily visible;

minimal oedema or minimal papular response”) according to the classification suggested by the EMA guideline (EMA/CPMP/EWP/280/96 Corr1). In very few

cases

score 3 (“erythema and papules”) was assigned. In one single case application site erosion was observed shortly after removal of the last out of three patches. This application site reaction was only mild in intensity and resolved spontaneously in the evening of the same day. None of the observed application site reactions led to discontinuation or required any treatment. All application site reactions improved over time within the observation period of 48 hours following removal of the patch.

In another adhesion and skin irritation clinical trial performed with a single patch application in elderly subject population (48 subjects aged between 55 and 90), application site reactions were mostly mild in intensity. Erythema was the most frequently observed dermal response. In general, observed application site reactions showed an improvement within the observation time interval of 72 hours following removal of the patch.

For 6 subjects (12.50%), a vesicular reaction [score 6 according to the classification suggested by the EMA guideline (EMA/CPMP/EWP/280/96 Corr1) and score 5 according to the Questions & Answers document (published in June 2018)] was seen after patch removal. In all cases, the reaction was of mild intensity and resolved spontaneously within a short period of time following patch removal (few hours to few days).

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It

allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal

product. Healthcare

professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store.

4.9 Overdose

5   PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: psychoanaleptics, anticholineste­rases, ATC code: N06DA03

Rivastigmine is an acetyl- and butyrylcholines­terase inhibitor of the carbamate type, thought to facilitate cholinergic neurotransmission by slowing the degradation of acetylcholine released by functionally intact cholinergic neurones. Thus, rivastigmine may have an ameliorative effect on cholinergic-mediated cognitive deficits in dementia associated with Alzheimer’s di­sease.

Rivastigmine interacts with its target enzymes by forming a covalently bound complex that temporarily inactivates the enzymes. In healthy young men, an oral 3 mg dose decreases acetylcholines­terase (AChE) activity in CSF by approximately 40% within the first 1.5 hours after administration. Activity of the enzyme returns to baseline levels about 9 hours after the maximum inhibitory effect has been achieved. In patients with Alzheimer’s di­sease, inhibition of AChE in CSF by oral rivastigmine was dose-dependent up to 6 mg given twice daily, the highest dose tested. Inhibition of butyrylcholines­terase activity in CSF of 14 Alzheimer patients treated by oral rivastigmine was similar to the inhibition of AChE activity.

Clinical studies in Alzheimer’s de­mentia with once daily reference transdermal patch

The efficacy of rivastigmine transdermal patches in patients with Alzheimer’s de­mentia has been demonstrated in a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled core study and its open-label extension phase and in a 48-week double blind comparator study.

24-weekplacebo-controlled study

Patients involved in the placebo-controlled study had an MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score of 10–20. Efficacy was established by the use of independent, domain-specific assessment tools which were applied at regular intervals during the 24-week treatment period. These include the ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s Di­sease Assessment Scale – Cognitive subscale, a performance-based measure of cognition) and the ADCS-CGIC (Alzheimer’s Di­sease Cooperative Study – Clinician’s Global Impression of Change, a comprehensive global assessment of the patient by the physician incorporating caregiver input), and the ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer’s Di­sease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living, a caregiver-rated assessment of the activities of daily living including personal hygiene, feeding, dressing, household chores such as shopping, retention of ability to orient oneself to surroundings as well as involvement in activities related to finances). The 24-week results for the three assessment tools are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2

* p<0.05 versus placebo

ITT: Intent-To-Treat; LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward

1 Based on ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and baseline value as a covariate. Negative ADAS-Cog changes indicate improvement. Positive ADCS-ADL changes indicate improvement.

2 Based on CMH test (van Elteren test) blocking for country. ADCS-CGIC scores <4 indicate improvement.

The results for clinically relevant responders from the 24-week placebo-controlled study are provided in Table 3. Clinically relevant improvement was defined a priori as at least 4-point improvement on the ADAS-Cog, no worsening on the ADCS-CGIC, and no worsening on the ADCS-ADL.

Table 3

* p<0.05 versus placebo As suggested by compartmental modelling, 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patches exhibited exposure similar to that provided by an oral dose of 12 mg/day.

48-week active comparator controlled study

Patients involved in the active comparator controlled study had an initial baseline MMSE score of 10–24. The study was designed to compare the efficacy of the 13.3 mg/24 h transdermal patch against the 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch during a 48-week double-blind treatment phase in Alzheimer’s disease patients who demonstrated functional and cognitive decline after an initial 24–48 week open-label treatment phase while on a maintenance dose of 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch. Functional decline was assessed by the investigator and cognitive decline was defined as a decrease in the MMSE score of >2 points from the previous visit or a decrease of >3 points from baseline. Efficacy was established by the use of ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s Di­sease Assessment Scale -Cognitive subscale, a performance-based measure of cognition) and the ADCS-IADL (Alzheimer’s Di­sease Cooperative Study – Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) assessing instrumental activities which include maintaining finances, meal preparation, shopping, ability to orient oneself to surroundings, ability to be left unattended. The 48-week results for the two assessment tools are summarised in Table 4.

Table 4

10 cm2

CI – confidence interval.

DLSM – difference in least square means.

LOCF – Last Observation Carried Forward.

ADAS-cog scores: A negative difference in DLSM indicates greater improvement in rivastigmine 15 cm2 as compared to rivastigmine 10 cm2.

ADCS-IADL scores: A positive difference in DLSM indicates greater improvement in rivastigmine 15 cm2 as compared to rivastigmine 10 cm2.

N is the number of patients with an assessment at baseline (last assessment in the initial openlabel phase) and with at least 1 post-baseline assessment (for the LOCF).

The DLSM, 95% CI, and p-value are based on an ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) model adjusted for country and baseline ADAS-cog score.

* p<0.05

Source: Study D2340-Table 11–6 and Table 11–7 with other rivastigmine containing medicinal products

The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with the reference medicinal product containing rivastigmine in all subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of Alzheimer’s de­mentia (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).

PK-PD correlation of rivastigmine plasma concentrations and BuChE inhibition in , plasma

The PK-PD correlation between rivastigmine plasma concentrations and the inhibition of BuChE in plasma after multiple applications of Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch was investigated in an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, multiple dose, cross-over study in healthy volunteers, using the once daily reference transdermal patch as a comparator. Each subject received either Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch, applied alternating for 4 days and 3 days or once daily reference transdermal patch 9.5 mg/24 h, each patch applied for 24 h. Blood samples for measurement of rivastigmine plasma concentrations as well as for determination of its inhibitory effect on plasma BuChE activity were taken over 384 h. Additional samples were taken prior to application of the first patch of each treatment (pre-dose).

After application of both Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch and once daily reference transdermal patch, inhibition values of BuChE showed comparably rapid onset and increase, with inhibition values close to the maximum reached within 8 h to 12 h. Inhibition of up to 50% of plasma BuChE activity was observed. The maximum inhibitory effect on plasma BuChE activity was comparable for both formulations.

The mean BuChE inhibition curve of Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch was well in line with the plasma concentration vs time curves of rivastigmine. Fluctuations present in the plasma concentrations vs time curve could also be observed in the extent of inhibition vs time curve, i.e. the extend of BuChE inhibition was proportional to the rivastigmine plasma concentration.

5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties

Absorption

Absorption of rivastigmine from Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly transdermal patch is slow. After the first dose, detectable plasma concentrations are observed after 2 hours. Cmax is reached after 18–32 hours, with the vast majority of subjects showing maximum plasma concentrations after 24–28 hours. After the peak, plasma concentrations very slowly decrease over the remainder of the application period (up to 4 days). With multiple dosing (such as at steady state), after the previous transdermal patch is replaced with a new one, plasma concentrations begin to rise again to reach a new peak between 16–28 hours. At steady state, trough levels are approximately 40% of peak levels after a 4 day dosing interval, in contrast to oral administration, with which concentrations fall off to virtually zero between doses.

The dose of rivastigmine released from the transdermal patch over 24 hours (mg/24 h) cannot be directly equated to the amount (mg) of rivastigmine contained in a capsule with respect to plasma concentration produced over 24 hours.

A relationship between active substance exposure at steady state (rivastigmine and metabolite NAP226–90) and bodyweight was observed in Alzheimer’s de­mentia patients. Compared to a patient with a body weight of 65 kg, the rivastigmine steady-state concentrations in a patient with a body weight of 35 kg would be approximately doubled, while for a patient with a body weight of 100 kg the concentrations would be approximately halved. The effect of bodyweight on active substance exposure suggests special attention to patients with very low body weight during up-titration (see section 4.4).

Exposure (AUC,) to rivastigmine was highest when the transdermal patch was applied to the upper back, chest, or upper arm and approximately 20–30% lower when applied to the abdomen or thigh.

There was no relevant accumulation of rivastigmine or the metabolite NAP226–90 in plasma in patients with Alzheimer’s di­sease, except that plasma levels were higher on the second day of transdermal patch therapy than on the first.

Distribution

Rivastigmine is weakly bound to plasma proteins (approximately 40%). It readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and has an apparent volume of distribution in the range of 1.8–2.7 l/kg.

Biotransformation

Mean apparent terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) after the multiday patch removal was calculated as 8.06 h for the 9.5 mg /24 h twice weekly patch. Metabolism has been shown to be rapid and extensive.

Elimination was absorption rate limited (flip-flop kinetics), which explains the longer t% after transdermal patch versus oral or intravenous administrations (1.4 to 1.7 h). Metabolism is primarily via cholinesterase-mediated hydrolysis to the metabolite NAP226–90. In vitro, this metabolite shows minimal inhibition of acetylcholines­terase (<10%).

Based on in vitro studies, no pharmacokinetic interaction is expected with medicinal products

metabolised by the following cytochrome isoenzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2D6,

CYP3A4/5, CYP2E1,

CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, or CYP2B6. Based on evidence from animal studies, the major cytochrome P450 isoenzymes are minimally involved in rivastigmine metabolism. Total plasma clearance of rivastigmine was approximately 130 litres/h after a 0.2 mg intravenous dose and decreased to 70 litres/h after a 2.7 mg intravenous dose, which is consistent with the non-linear, over-proportional pharmacokinetics of rivastigmine due to saturation of its elimination.

The metabolite-to-parent AUCœ ratio was around 0.7 after transdermal patch administration of the once daily reference transdermal patch versus 3.5 after oral administration, indicating that much less metabolism occurred after dermal compared to oral treatment. Less NAP226–90 is formed following application of the transdermal patch, presumably because of the lack of presystemic (hepatic first pass) metabolism, in contrast to oral administration.

Elimination

Unchanged rivastigmine is found in trace amounts in the urine; renal excretion of the metabolites is the major route of elimination after transdermal patch administration. Following administration of oral 14C-rivastigmine, renal elimination was rapid and essentially complete (>90%) within 24 hours. Less than 1% of the administered dose is excreted in the faeces.

A population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that nicotine use increases the oral clearance of

rivastigmine by 23% in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (n=75 smokers and 549 non-smokers)

following rivastigmine oral capsule doses for up to 12 mg/day.

Special populations

Elderly

Age had no impact on the exposure to rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s disease patients treated with rivastigmine transdermal patches.

Hepatic impairment

No study was conducted with rivastigmine transdermal patches in subjects with hepatic impairment. After oral administration, the Cmax of rivastigmine was approximately 60% higher and the AUC of rivastigmine was more than twice as high in subjects with mild to moderate hepatic impairment than in healthy subjects.

Following a single 3 mg or 6 mg oral dose, the mean oral clearance of rivastigmine was approximately

46–63% lower in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment (n=10, Child-Pugh score 5–12, biopsy proven) than in healthy subjects (n=10).

Renal impairment

No study was conducted with rivastigmine transdermal patches in subjects with renal impairment. Based on population analysis, creatinine clearance did not show any clear effect on steady state concentrations of rivastigmine or its metabolite. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with renal impairment (see section 4.2).

Bioequivalence study with Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch

The pharmacokinetics of Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch was investigated in an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, multiple dose, cross-over relative bioavailability study to assess bioequivalence to the once daily reference transdermal patch under steady state in healthy volunteers. 57 subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic assessment.

Each subject received either Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch, applied alternating for 4 days and 3 days or once daily reference transdermal patch 9.5 mg/24 h, each patch applied for 24 h.

After steady state was reached, assessment of bioequivalence was done by comparing AUC, Cmax, Cmin and CTau under steady state conditions over a one week period, for Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch with 2 patches (applied 3 days and 4 days) and for the reference with 7 patches:

Table 5

Test

Reference

Maximum plasma concentration

Absolute minimum plasma concentration

interval

The ranges of observed Cmax, values (minimum to maximum) within this observation period were 4.70 ng/ml to 18.4 ng/ml for Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch and 3.78 ng/ml to 22.9 ng/ml for reference. The ranges of observed Cmin values (minimum-maximum) were 0.602 – 6.02 ng/ml for Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch and 0.429 – 5.46 ng/ml for reference.

Bioequivalence to the once daily reference transdermal patch was demonstrated with respect to all target pharmacokinetic parameters within the one-week period under steady-state conditions. Extent of exposure (AUC), maximum (Cmax) and absolute minimum (Cmin) concentrations were similar for Rivastigmine Luye twice weekly 9.5 mg/24 h transdermal patch and the reference product. Trough levels at the end of the 4 day dosing interval in steady state (Ctau) were about 40 % of the peak and thus comparable to that observed of the once daily reference transdermal patch in this study.

5.3 Preclinical safety data

Oral and topical repeated-dose toxicity studies in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs and minipigs revealed only effects associated with an exaggerated pharmacological action. No target organ toxicity was observed. Oral and topical dosing in animal studies was limited due to the sensitivity of the animal models used.

Rivastigmine was not mutagenic in a standard battery of in vitro and in vivo tests, except in a chromosomal aberration test in human peripheral lymphocytes at a dose exceeding 104 times the foreseen clinical exposure. The in vivo micronucleus test was negative. The major metabolite NAP226–90 also did not show a genotoxic potential.

No evidence of carcinogenicity was found in oral and topical studies in mice and in an oral study in rats at the maximum tolerated dose. The exposure to rivastigmine and its metabolites was approximately equivalent to human exposure with highest doses of rivastigmine capsules and transdermal patches.

In animals, rivastigmine crosses the placenta and is excreted into milk. Oral studies in pregnant rats and rabbits gave no indication of teratogenic potential on the part of rivastigmine. In oral studies with male and female rats, no adverse effects of rivastigmine were observed on fertility or reproductive performance of either the parent generation or the offspring of the parents. Specific dermal studies in pregnant animals have not been conducted.

Rivastigmine transdermal patches were not phototoxic and considered to be a non-sensitiser. In some other dermal toxicity studies, a mild irritant effect on the skin of laboratory animals, including controls, was observed. This may indicate a potential for rivastigmine transdermal patches to induce mild erythema in patients.

A mild eye/mucosal irritation potential of rivastigmine was identified in a rabbit study. Therefore, the patient/caregiver should avoid contact with the eyes after handling of the patch (see section 4.4).

6 PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS

6.1 List of excipients

Backing film:

– polyethylene terephthalate film

Active layer:

– tocopherol

– poly[(2-ethylhexyl)acry­late, vinylacetate] (1:1)

– copolymer of butyl acrylate and butyl methacrylate

Drug permeable membrane:

– polyethylene film

Adhesive layer:

– medium molecular weight polyisobutylene

– high molecular weight polyisobutylene

– polybutene

Release liner:

– siliconised polyester film

blue printing ink

6.2 Incompatibilities

Not applicable.

6.3 Shelf life

2 years

6.4 Special precautions for storage

This medicinal product does not require any special storage conditions.

6.5 Nature and contents of container

The transdermal patches are packed in child-resistant sachets made of a paper / polyethylene terephthalate / aluminium / polyacrylnitrile multilaminated material. One sachet contains one transdermal patch.

The adhesive covers are packed in sachets made of a paper / polyethylene / aluminium / surlyn multilaminated material. One sachet contains one adhesive cover.

Available in packs containing 2, 8, 16 or 24 transdermal patches and 2, 8, 16 or 24 adhesive covers.

Not all pack sizes may be marketed.

6.6 Special precautions for disposal

Used transdermal patches should be folded in half, with the adhesive side inwards, placed in the original sachet and discarded safely. Any used or unused transdermal patches should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.

7 MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDER

Luye Pharma Ltd.,

40 Occam Road,

Guildford,

GU2 7YG, UK