Summary of medicine characteristics - Emend
1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT
EMEND 125 mg hard capsules
EMEND 80 mg hard capsules
2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION
Each 125 mg capsule contains 125 mg of aprepitant. Each 80 mg capsule contains 80 mg of aprepitant.
Excipient with known effect
Each capsule contains 125 mg of sucrose (in the 125 mg capsule).
Excipient with known effect
Each capsule contains 80 mg of sucrose (in the 80 mg capsule).
For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.
3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM
Hard capsule.
The 125 mg capsule is opaque with a white body and pink cap with “462” and “125 mg” printed radially in black ink on the body. The 80 mg capsules are opaque with a white body and cap with “461” and “80 mg” printed radially in black ink on the body.
4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS4.1 Therapeutic indications
Prevention nausea and vomiting associated with highly and moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy in adults and adolescents from the age of 12.
EMEND 125 mg/80 mg is given as part of combination therapy (see section 4.2).
4.2 Posology and method of administration
Posology
Adults
EMEND is given for 3 days as part of a regimen that includes a corticosteroid and a 5-HT3 antagonist.
The recommended dose is 125 mg orally once daily one hour before start of chemotherapy on Day 1 and 80 mg orally once daily on Days 2 and 3 in the morning.
The following regimens are recommended in adults for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic cancer chemotherapy:
Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy Regimen
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | |
| EMEND | 125 mg orally | 80 mg orally | 80 mg orally | none |
| Dexamethasone | 12 mg orally | 8 mg orally | 8 mg orally | 8 mg orally |
| 5-HT3 antagonists | Standard dose of 5-HT3 antagonists. See the product information for the selected 5-HT3 antagonist for appropriate dosing information | none | none | none |
| Dexamethasone should | be administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy treatment on Day 1 and in | |||
the morning on Days 2 to 4. The dose of dexamethasone accounts for active substance interactions.
Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy Regimen
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | |
| EMEND | 125 mg orally | 80 mg orally | 80 mg orally |
| Dexamethasone | 12 mg orally | none | none |
| 5-HT3 antagonists | Standard dose of 5-HT3 antagonists. See the product information for the selected 5-HT3 antagonist for appropriate dosing information | none | none |
Dexamethasone should be administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy treatment on Day 1. The dose of dexamethasone accounts for active substance interactions.
Paediatric population
Adolescents (aged 12 through 17 years)
EMEND is given for 3 days as part of a regimen that includes a 5-HT3 antagonist. The recommended dose of capsules of EMEND is 125 mg orally on Day 1 and 80 mg orally on Days 2 and 3. EMEND is administered orally 1 hour prior to chemotherapy on Days 1, 2 and 3. If no chemotherapy is given on Days 2 and 3, EMEND should be administered in the morning. See the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for the selected 5-HT3 antagonist for appropriate dosing information. If a corticosteroid, such as dexamethasone, is co-administered with EMEND, the dose of the corticosteroid should be administered at 50 % of the usual dose (see sections 4.5 and 5.1).
The safety and efficacy of the 80 mg and 125 mg capsules have not been demonstrated in children less than 12 years of age. No data are available. Refer to the powder for oral suspension SmPC for appropriate dosing in infants, toddlers and children aged 6 months to less than 12 years.
General
Efficacy data in combination with other corticosteroids and 5-HT3 antagonists are limited. For additional information on the co-administration with corticosteroids, see section 4.5. Please refer to the SmPC of co-administered 5-HT3 antagonist medicinal products.
Special populations
Elderly (> 65 years)
No dose adjustment is necessary for the elderly (see section 5.2).
Gender
No dose adjustment is necessary based on gender (see section 5.2).
Renal impairment
No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with renal impairment or for patients with end stage renal disease undergoing haemodialysis (see section 5.2).
Hepatic impairment
No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with mild hepatic impairment. There are limited data in patients with moderate hepatic impairment and no data in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Aprepitant should be used with caution in these patients (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).
Method of administration
The hard capsule should be swallowed whole.
EMEND may be taken with or without food.
4.3 Contraindications
Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.
Co-administration with pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole or cisapride (see section 4.5).
4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use
Patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment
There are limited data in patients with moderate hepatic impairment and no data in patients with severe hepatic impairment. EMEND should be used with caution in these patients (see section 5.2).
CYP3A4 interactions
EMEND should be used with caution in patients receiving concomitant orally administered active substances that are metabolised primarily through CYP3A4 and with a narrow therapeutic range, such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, alfentanil, ergot alkaloid derivatives, fentanyl, and quinidine (see section 4.5). Additionally, concomitant administration with irinotecan should be approached with particular caution as the combination might result in increased toxicity.
Co-administration with warfarin (a CYP2C9 substrate)
In patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the International Normalised Ratio (INR) should be monitored closely during treatment with EMEND and for 14 days following each 3-day course of EMEND (see section 4.5).
Co-administration with hormonal contraceptives
The efficacy of hormonal contraceptives may be reduced during and for 28 days after administration of EMEND. Alternative non-hormonal back-up methods of contraception should be used during treatment with EMEND and for 2 months following the last dose of EMEND (see section 4.5).
Excipients
EMEND capsules contain sucrose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or sucrase-isomaltase insufficiency should not take this medicine.
Sodium
This medicinal product contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per capsule, that is to say essentially ‘sodium-free’.
4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
Aprepitant (125 mg/80 mg) is a substrate, a moderate inhibitor, and an inducer of CYP3A4. Aprepitant is also an inducer of CYP2C9. During treatment with EMEND, CYP3A4 is inhibited. After the end of treatment, EMEND causes a transient mild induction of CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and glucuronidation.
Aprepitant does not seem to interact with the P-glycoprotein transporter, as suggested by the lack of interaction of aprepitant with digoxin.
Effect aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of other active substances CYP3A4 inhibition
As a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4, aprepitant (125 mg/80 mg) can increase plasma concentrations of co-administered active substances that are metabolised through CYP3A4. The total exposure of orally administered CYP3A4 substrates may increase up to approximately 3-fold during the 3-day treatment with EMEND; the effect of aprepitant on the plasma concentrations of intravenously administered CYP3A4 substrates is expected to be smaller. EMEND must not be used concurrently with pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, or cisapride (see section 4.3). Inhibition of CYP3A4 by aprepitant could result in elevated plasma concentrations of these active substances, potentially causing serious or life-threatening reactions. Caution is advised during concomitant administration of EMEND and orally administered active substances that are metabolised primarily through CYP3A4 and with a narrow therapeutic range, such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, alfentanil, diergotamine, ergotamine, fentanyl, and quinidine (see section 4.4).
Corticosteroids
Dexamethasone: The usual oral dexamethasone dose should be reduced by approximately 50 % when co-administered with EMEND 125 mg/80 mg regimen. The dose of dexamethasone in chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) clinical trials was chosen to account for active substance interactions (see section 4.2). EMEND, when given as a regimen of 125 mg with dexamethasone co-administered orally as 20 mg on Day 1, and EMEND when given as 80 mg/day with dexamethasone co-administered orally as 8 mg on Days 2 through 5, increased the AUC of dexamethasone, a CYP3A4 substrate, 2.2-fold on Days 1 and 5.
Methylprednisolone: The usual intravenously administered methylprednisolone dose should be reduced approximately 25 %, and the usual oral methylprednisolone dose should be reduced approximately 50 % when co-administered with EMEND 125 mg/80 mg regimen. EMEND, when given as a regimen of 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3, increased the AUC of methylprednisolone, a CYP3A4 substrate, by 1.3-fold on Day 1 and by 2.5-fold on Day 3, when methylprednisolone was co-administered intravenously as 125 mg on Day 1 and orally as 40 mg on Days 2 and 3.
During continuous treatment with methylprednisolone, the AUC of methylprednisolone may decrease at later time points within 2 weeks following initiation of the EMEND dose, due to the inducing effect of aprepitant on CYP3A4. This effect may be expected to be more pronounced for orally administered methylprednisolone.
Chemotherapeutic medicinal products
In pharmacokinetic studies, EMEND, when given as a regimen of 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3, did not influence the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel administered intravenously on Day 1 or vinorelbine administered intravenously on Day 1 or Day 8. Because the effect of EMEND on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered CYP3A4 substrates is greater than the effect of EMEND on the pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered CYP3A4 substrates, an interaction with orally administered chemotherapeutic medicinal products metabolised primarily or partly by CYP3A4 (e.g., etoposide, vinorelbine) cannot be excluded. Caution is advised and additional monitoring may be appropriate in patients receiving medicinal products metabolised primarily or partly by CYP3A4 (see section 4.4). Postmarketing events of neurotoxicity, a potential adverse reaction of ifosfamide, have been reported after aprepitant and ifosfamide co-administration.
Immunosuppressants
During the 3-day CINV regimen, a transient moderate increase followed by a mild decrease in exposure of immunosuppressants metabolised by CYP3A4 (e.g., cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus and sirolimus) is expected. Given the short duration of the 3-day regimen and the time-dependent limited changes in exposure, dose reduction of the immunosuppressant is not recommended during the 3 days of co-administration with EMEND.
Midazolam
The potential effects of increased plasma concentrations of midazolam or other benzodiazepines metabolised via CYP3A4 (alprazolam, triazolam) should be considered when co-administering these medicinal products with EMEND (125 mg/80 mg).
EMEND increased the AUC of midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, 2.3-fold on Day 1 and 3.3-fold on Day 5, when a single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam was co-administered on Days 1 and 5 of a regimen of EMEND 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 to 5.
In another study with intravenous administration of midazolam, EMEND was given as 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3, and 2 mg midazolam was given intravenously prior to the administration of the 3-day regimen of EMEND and on Days 4, 8, and 15. EMEND increased the AUC of midazolam 25 % on Day 4 and decreased the AUC of midazolam 19 % on Day 8 and 4 % on Day 15. These effects were not considered clinically important.
In a third study with intravenous and oral administration of midazolam, EMEND was given as 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3, together with ondansetron 32 mg Day 1, dexamethasone 12 mg Day 1 and 8 mg Days 2–4. This combination (i.e. EMEND, ondansetron and dexamethasone) decreased the AUC of oral midazolam 16 % on Day 6, 9 % on Day 8, 7 % on Day 15 and 17 % on Day 22. These effects were not considered clinically important.
An additional study was completed with intravenous administration of midazolam and EMEND. Intravenous 2 mg midazolam was given 1 hour after oral administration of a single dose of EMEND 125 mg. The plasma AUC of midazolam was increased by 1.5-fold. This effect was not considered clinically important.
Induction
As a mild inducer of CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and glucuronidation, aprepitant can decrease plasma concentrations of substrates eliminated by these routes within two weeks following initiation and treatment. This effect may become apparent only after the end of a 3-day treatment with EMEND. For CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 substrates, the induction is transient with a maximum effect reached 3–5 days after end of the EMEND 3-day treatment. The effect is maintained for a few days, thereafter slowly declines and is clinically insignificant by two weeks after end of EMEND treatment. Mild induction of glucuronidation is also seen with 80 mg oral aprepitant given for 7 days. Data are lacking regarding effects on CYP2C8 and CYP2C19. Caution is advised when warfarin, acenocoumarol, tolbutamide, phenytoin or other active substances that are known to be metabolised by CYP2C9 are administered during this time period.
Warfarin
In patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the prothrombin time (INR) should be monitored closely during treatment with EMEND and for 2 weeks following each 3-day course of EMEND for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (see section 4.4). When a single 125 mg dose of EMEND was administered on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3 to healthy subjects who were stabilised on chronic warfarin therapy, there was no effect of EMEND on the plasma AUC of R(+) or S(-) warfarin determined on Day 3; however, there was a 34 % decrease in S(-) warfarin (a CYP2C9 substrate) trough concentration accompanied by a 14 % decrease in INR 5 days after completion of treatment with EMEND.
Tolbutamide
EMEND, when given as 125 mg on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3, decreased the AUC of tolbutamide (a CYP2C9 substrate) by 23 % on Day 4, 28 % on Day 8, and 15 % on Day 15, when a single dose of tolbutamide 500 mg was administered orally prior to the administration of the 3-day regimen of EMEND and on Days 4, 8, and 15.
Hormonal contraceptives
The efficacy of hormonal contraceptives may be reduced during and for 28 days after administration of EMEND. Alternative non-hormonal back-up methods of contraception should be used during treatment with EMEND and for 2 months following the last dose of EMEND.
In a clinical study, single doses of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were administered on Days 1 through 21 with EMEND, given as a regimen of 125 mg on Day 8 and 80 mg/day on Days 9 and 10 with ondansetron 32 mg intravenously on Day 8 and oral dexamethasone given as 12 mg on Day 8 and 8 mg/day on Days 9, 10, and 11. During days 9 through 21 in this study, there was as much as a 64 % decrease in ethinyl estradiol trough concentrations and as much as a 60 % decrease in norethindrone trough concentrations.
5-HT 3 antagonists
In clinical interaction studies, aprepitant did not have clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron, granisetron, or hydrodolasetron (the active metabolite of dolasetron).
Effect of other medicinal products on the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant
Concomitant administration of EMEND with active substances that inhibit CYP3A4 activity (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, nefazodone, and protease inhibitors) should be approached cautiously, as the combination is expected to result several-fold in increased plasma concentrations of aprepitant (see section 4.4).
Concomitant administration of EMEND with active substances that strongly induce CYP3A4 activity (e.g., rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital) should be avoided as the combination results in reductions of the plasma concentrations of aprepitant that may result in decreased efficacy of EMEND. Concomitant administration of EMEND with herbal preparations containing St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum ) is not recommended.
Ketoconazole
When a single 125 mg dose of aprepitant was administered on Day 5 of a 10-day regimen of 400 mg/day of ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, the AUC of aprepitant increased approximately 5-fold and the mean terminal half-life of aprepitant increased approximately 3-fold.
Rifampicin
When a single 375 mg dose of aprepitant was administered on Day 9 of a 14-day regimen of 600 mg/day of rifampicin, a strong CYP3A4 inducer, the AUC of aprepitant decreased 91 % and the mean terminal half-life decreased 68 %.
Paediatric population
Interaction studies have only been performed in adults.
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Contraception in males and females
The efficacy of hormonal contraceptives may be reduced during and for 28 days after administration of EMEND. Alternative non-hormonal back-up methods of contraception should be used during treatment with EMEND and for 2 months following the last dose of EMEND (see sections 4.4 and 4.5).
Pregnancy
For aprepitant no clinical data on exposed pregnancies are available. The potential for reproductive toxicity of aprepitant has not been fully characterised, since exposure levels above the therapeutic exposure in humans at the 125 mg/80 mg dose could not be attained in animal studies. These studies did not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryonal/foetal development, parturition or postnatal development (see section 5.3). The potential effects on reproduction of alterations in neurokinin regulation are unknown. EMEND should not be used during pregnancy unless clearly necessary.
Breast-feeding
Aprepitant is excreted in the milk of lactating rats. It is not known whether aprepitant is excreted in human milk; therefore, breast-feeding is not recommended during treatment with EMEND.
Fertility
The potential for effects of aprepitant on fertility has not been fully characterised because exposure levels above the therapeutic exposure in humans could not be attained in animal studies. These fertility studies did not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to mating performance, fertility, embryonic/foetal development, or sperm count and motility (see section 5.3).
4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines
EMEND may have minor influence on the ability to drive, cycle and use machines. Dizziness and fatigue may occur following administration of EMEND (see section 4.8).
4.8 Undesirable effects
Summary of the safety profile
The safety profile of aprepitant was evaluated in approximately 6,500 adults in more than 50 studies and 184 children and adolescents in 2 pivotal paediatric clinical trials.
The most common adverse reactions reported at a greater incidence in adults treated with the aprepitant regimen than with standard therapy in patients receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy (HEC) were: hiccups (4.6 % versus 2.9 %), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (2.8 % versus 1.1 %), dyspepsia (2.6 % versus 2.0 %), constipation (2.4 % versus 2.0 %), headache (2.0 % versus 1.8 %), and decreased appetite (2.0 % versus 0.5 %). The most common adverse reaction reported at a greater incidence in patients treated with the aprepitant regimen than with standard therapy in patients receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy (MEC) was fatigue (1.4 % versus 0.9 %).
The most common adverse reactions reported at a greater incidence in paediatric patients treated with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen while receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy were hiccups (3.3 % versus 0.0 %) and flushing (1.1 % versus 0.0 %).
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
The following adverse reactions were observed in a pooled analysis of the HEC and MEC studies at a greater incidence with aprepitant than with standard therapy in adults or paediatric patients or in postmarketing use. The frequency categories given in the table are based on the studies in adults; the observed frequencies in the paediatric studies were similar or lower, unless shown in the table. Some less common ADRs in the adult population were not observed in the paediatric studies.
Frequencies are defined as: very common (> 1/10); common (> 1/100 to < 1/10); uncommon (> 1/1,000 to < 1/100); rare (> 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000) and very rare (< 1/10,000), not known (cannot be estimated from the available data).
| System organ class | Adverse reaction | Frequency |
| Infection and infestations | candidiasis, staphylococcal infection | rare |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | febrile neutropenia, anaemia | uncommon |
| Immune system disorders | hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic reactions | not known |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | decreased appetite | common |
| polydipsia | rare |
| System organ class | Adverse reaction | Frequency |
| Psychiatric disorders | anxiety | uncommon |
| disorientation, euphoric mood | rare | |
| Nervous system disorders | headache | common |
| dizziness, somnolence | uncommon | |
| cognitive disorder, lethargy, dysgeusia | rare | |
| Eye disorders | conjunctivitis | rare |
| Ear and labyrinth disorders | tinnitus | rare |
| Cardiac disorders | palpitations | uncommon |
| bradycardia, cardiovascular disorder | rare | |
| Vascular disorders | hot flush/flushing | uncommon |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | hiccups | common |
| oropharyngeal pain, sneezing, cough, postnasal drip, throat irritation | rare | |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | constipation, dyspepsia | common |
| eructation, nausea', vomiting'1', gastroesophageal reflux disease, abdominal pain, dry mouth, flatulence | uncommon | |
| duodenal ulcer perforation, stomatitis, abdominal distension, faeces hard, neutropenic colitis | rare | |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | rash, acne | uncommon |
| photosensitivity reaction, hyperhidrosis, seborrhoea, skin lesion, rash pruritic, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis | rare | |
| pruritus, urticaria | not known | |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | muscular weakness, muscle spasms | rare |
| Renal and urinary disorders | dysuria | uncommon |
| pollakiuria | rare |
| System organ class | Adverse reaction | Frequency |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | fatigue | common |
| asthenia, malaise | uncommon | |
| oedema, chest discomfort, gait disturbance | rare | |
| Investigations | ALT increased | common |
| AST increased, blood alkaline phosphatase increased | uncommon | |
| red blood cells urine positive, blood sodium decreased, weight decreased, neutrophil count decreased, glucose urine present, urine output increased | rare |
^Nausea and vomiting were efficacy parameters in the first 5 days of post-chemotherapy treatment and were reported as adverse reactions only thereafter.
Description of selected adverse reactions
The adverse reactions profiles in adults in the Multiple-Cycle extension of HEC and MEC studies for up to 6 additional cycles of chemotherapy were generally similar to those observed in Cycle 1.
In an additional active-controlled clinical study in 1,169 adult patients receiving aprepitant and HEC, the adverse reactions profile was generally similar to that seen in the other HEC studies with aprepitant.
Non-CINV studies
Additional adverse reactions were observed in adult patients treated with a single 40 mg dose of aprepitant for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) with a greater incidence than with ondansetron: abdominal pain upper, bowel sounds abnormal, constipation*, dysarthria, dyspnoea, hypoaesthesia, insomnia, miosis, nausea, sensory disturbance, stomach discomfort, sub-ileus*, visual acuity reduced, wheezing.
*Reported in patients taking a higher dose of aprepitant.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system listed in
4.9 Overdose
In the event of overdose, EMEND should be discontinued and general supportive treatment and monitoring should be provided. Because of the antiemetic activity of aprepitant, emesis induced by a medicinal product may not be effective.
Aprepitant cannot be removed by haemodialysis.
5. PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antiemetics and antinauseants, ATC code: A04AD12
Aprepitant is a selective high-affinity antagonist at human substance P neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors.
3-day regimen of aprepitant in adults
In 2 randomised, double-blind studies encompassing a total of 1,094 adult patients receiving chemotherapy that included cisplatin > 70 mg/m2, aprepitant in combination with an ondansetron/dexamethasone regimen (see section 4.2) was compared with a standard regimen (placebo plus ondansetron 32 mg intravenously administered on Day 1 plus dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Day 1 and 8 mg orally twice daily on Days 2 to 4). Although a 32 mg intravenous dose of ondansetron was used in clinical trials, this is no longer the recommended dose. See the product information for the selected 5-HT3 antagonist for appropriate dosing information.
Efficacy was based on evaluation of the following composite measure: complete response (defined as no emetic episodes and no use of rescue therapy) primarily during Cycle 1. The results were evaluated for each individual study and for the 2 studies combined.
A summary of the key study results from the combined analysis is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Percent of adult patients receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy responding by treatment group and phase — Cycle 1
Aprepitant regimen Standard therapy Differences* (N= 521)t (N= 524)t
COMPOSITE MEASURES % %
% (95 % CI)
| Complete response (no emesis and no rescue | therapy) | |||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 67.7 | 47.8 | 19.9 | (14.0, 25.8) |
| 0–24 hours | 86.0 | 73.2 | 12.7 | (7.9, 17.6) |
| 25–120 hours | 71.5 | 51.2 | 20.3 | (14.5, 26.1) |
INDIVIDUAL MEASURES
No emesis (no emetic episodes regardless of use of rescue therapy)
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 71.9 | 49.7 | 22.2 | (16.4, 28.0) |
| 0–24 hours | 86.8 | 74.0 | 12.7 | (8.0, 17.5) |
| 25–120 hours | 76.2 | 53.5 | 22.6 | (17.0, 28.2) |
| No significant nausea (maximum VAS < 25 mm on a scale of 0- | 100 mm) | |||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 72.1 | 64.9 | 7.2 | (1.6, 12.8) |
| 25–120 hours | 74.0 | 66.9 | 7.1 | (1.5, 12.6) |
* The confidence intervals were calculated with no adjustment for gender and concomitant chemotherapy, which were included in the primary analysis of odds ratios and logistic models.
t One patient in the aprepitant regimen only had data in the acute phase and was excluded from the overall and delayed phase analyses; one patient in the Standard regimen only had data in the delayed phase and was excluded from the overall and acute phase analyses.
The estimated time to first emesis in the combined analysis is depicted by the Kaplan-Meier plot in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Percent of adult patients receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy who remain emesis free over time – Cycle 1
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
Time (hours)
Statistically significant differences in efficacy were also observed in each of the 2 individual studies.
In the same 2 clinical studies, 851 adult patients continued into the Multiple-Cycle extension for up to 5 additional cycles of chemotherapy. The efficacy of the aprepitant regimen was apparently maintained during all cycles.
In a randomised, double-blind study in a total of 866 adult patients (864 females, 2 males) receiving chemotherapy that included cyclophosphamide 750–1,500 mg/m2; or cyclophosphamide 500–1,500 mg/m2 and doxorubicin (< 60 mg/m2) or epirubicin (<_ 100 mg/m2), aprepitant in combination with an ondansetron/dexamethasone regimen (see section 4.2) was compared with standard therapy (placebo plus ondansetron 8 mg orally (twice on Day 1, and every 12 hours on Days 2 and 3) plus dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Day 1).
Efficacy was based on evaluation of the composite measure: complete response (defined as no emetic episodes and no use of rescue therapy) primarily during Cycle 1.
A summary of the key study results is shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Percent of adult patients responding by treatment group and phase — Cycle 1 Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
| Aprepitant regimen | Standard therapy | Differences* | |
| COMPOSITE MEASURES | (N= 433)t | (N= 424) | |
| % | % | % (95 % CI) |
Complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy)
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 50.8 | 42.5 | 8.3 | (1.6, 15.0) |
| 0–24 hours | 75.7 | 69.0 | 6.7 | (0.7, 12.7) |
| 25–120 hours | 55.4 | 49.1 | 6.3 | (-0.4, 13.0) |
INDIVIDUAL MEASURES
No emesis (no emetic episodes regardless of use of rescue therapy)
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 75.7 | 58.7 | 17.0 | (10.8, 23.2) |
| 0–24 hours | 87.5 | 77.3 | 10.2 | (5.1, 15.3) |
| 25–120 hours | 80.8 | 69.1 | 11.7 | (5.9, 17.5) |
| No significant nausea (maximum VAS < 25 mm on a scale of 0–100 mm) | ||||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 60.9 | 55.7 | 5.3 | (-1.3, 11.9) |
| 0–24 hours | 79.5 | 78.3 | 1.3 | (-4.2, 6.8) |
| 25–120 hours | 65.3 | 61.5 | 3.9 | (-2.6, 10.3) |
* The confidence intervals were calculated with no adjustment for age category (< 55 years, > 55 years) and investigator group, which were included in the primary analysis of odds ratios and logistic models.
t One patient in the aprepitant regimen only had data in the acute phase and was excluded from the overall and delayed phase analyses.
In the same clinical study, 744 adult patients continued into the Multiple-Cycle extension for up to 3 additional cycles of chemotherapy. The efficacy of the aprepitant regimen was apparently maintained during all cycles.
In a second multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, clinical study, the aprepitant regimen was compared with standard therapy in 848 adult patients (652 females, 196 males) receiving a chemotherapy regimen that included any intravenous dose of oxaliplatin, carboplatin, epirubicin, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, daunorubicin, doxorubicin; cyclophosphamide intravenously (< 1,500 mg/m2); or cytarabine intravenously (> 1 g/m2). Patients receiving the aprepitant regimen were receiving chemotherapy for a variety of tumour types including 52 % with breast cancer, 21 % with gastrointestinal cancers including colorectal cancer, 13 % with lung cancer and 6 % with gynaecological cancers. The aprepitant regimen in combination with an ondansetron/dexamethasone regimen (see section 4.2) was compared with standard therapy (placebo in combination with ondansetron 8 mg orally (twice on Day 1, and every 12 hours on Days 2 and 3) plus dexamethasone 20 mg orally on Day 1).
Efficacy was based on the evaluation of the following primary and key secondary endpoints: No vomiting in the overall period (0 to 120 hours post-chemotherapy), evaluation of safety and tolerability of the aprepitant regimen for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and complete response (defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) in the overall period (0 to 120 hours post-chemotherapy). Additionally, no significant nausea in the overall period (0 to 120 hours post-chemotherapy) was evaluated as an exploratory endpoint, and in the acute and delayed phases as a post-hoc analysis.
A summary of the key study results is shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Percent of adult patients responding by treatment group and phase for Study 2 – Cycle 1 Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
| Aprepitant regimen (N= 425) % | Standard Differences* therapy (N= 406) % % (95 % CI) |
| Complete response (no emesis and | no rescue therapy) | |||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 68.7 | 56.3 | 12.4 | (5.9, 18.9) |
| 0–24 hours | 89.2 | 80.3 | 8.9 | (4.0, 13.8) |
| 25–120 hours | 70.8 | 60.9 | 9.9 | (3.5, 16.3) |
| No emesis (no emetic episodes regardless of use of rescue therapy) | ||||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 76.2 | 62.1 | 14.1 | (7.9, 20.3) |
| 0–24 hours | 92.0 | 83.7 | 8.3 | (3.9, 12.7) |
| 25–120 hours | 77.9 | 66.8 | 11.1 | (5.1, 17.1) |
| No significant nausea (maximum VAS < 25 mm on a scale of 0–100 mm) | ||||
| Overall (0–120 hours) | 73.6 | 66.4 | 7.2 | (1.0, 13.4) |
| 0–24 hours | 90.9 | 86.3 | 4.6 | (0.2, 9.0) |
| 25–120 hours | 74.9 | 69.5 | 5.4 | (-0.7, 11.5) |
* The confidence intervals were calculated with no adjustment for gender and region, which were included in the
primary analysis using logistic models.
The benefit of aprepitant combination therapy in the full study population was mainly driven by the results observed in patients with poor control with the standard regimen such as in women, even though the results were numerically better regardless of age, tumour type or gender. Complete response to the aprepitant regimen and standard therapy, respectively, was reached in 209/324 (65 %) and 161/320 (50 %) in women and 83/101 (82 %) and 68/87 (78 %) of men.
Paediatric population
In a randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled clinical study that included 302 children and adolescents (aged 6 months to 17 years) receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the aprepitant regimen was compared to a control regimen for the prevention of CINV. The efficacy of the aprepitant regimen was evaluated in a single cycle (Cycle 1). Patients had the opportunity to receive open-label aprepitant in subsequent cycles (Optional Cycles 2–6); however efficacy was not assessed in these optional cycles. The aprepitant regimen for adolescents aged 12 through 17 years (n=47) consisted of EMEND capsules 125 mg orally on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3 in combination with ondansetron on Day 1. The aprepitant regimen for children aged 6 months to less than 12 years (n=105) consisted of EMEND powder for oral suspension 3.0 mg/kg (up to 125 mg) orally on Day 1 and 2.0 mg/kg (up to 80 mg) orally on Days 2 and 3 in combination with ondansetron on Day 1. The control regimen in adolescents aged 12 through 17 years (n=48) and children aged 6 months to less than 12 years (n=102) consisted of placebo for aprepitant on Days 1, 2 and 3 in combination with ondansetron on Day 1. EMEND or placebo and ondansetron were administered 1 hour and 30 minutes prior to initiation of chemotherapy, respectively. Intravenous dexamethasone was permitted as part of the antiemetic regimen for paediatric patients in both age groups, at the discretion of the physician. A dose reduction (50 %) of dexamethasone was required for paediatric patients receiving aprepitant. No dose reduction was required for paediatric patients receiving the control regimen. Of the paediatric patients, 29 % in the aprepitant regimen and 28 % in the control regimen used dexamethasone as part of the regimen in Cycle 1.
The antiemetic activity of EMEND was evaluated over a 5-day (120 hour) period following the initiation of chemotherapy on Day 1. The primary endpoint was complete response in the delayed phase (25 to 120 hours following initiation of chemotherapy) in Cycle 1. A summary of the key study results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Number (%) of paediatric patients with complete response and no vomiting by treatment group and phase – Cycle 1 (Intent to treat population)
| Aprepitant regimen n/m (%) | Control regimen n/m (%) | |
| PRIMARY ENDPOINT | ||
| Complete response* – Delayed phase | 77/152 (50.7)i | 39/150 (26.0) |
| OTHER PRESPECIFIED ENDPOINTS | ||
| Complete response* – Acute phase | 101/152 (66.4)i | 78/150 (52.0) |
| Complete response* – Overall phase | 61/152 (40.1)i | 30/150 (20.0) |
| No vomiting§ – Overall phase | 71/152 (46.7)t | 32/150 (21.3) |
| *Complete response = No vomiting or retching or c ip < 0.01 when compared to control regimen. ip < 0.05 when compared to control regimen. §No vomiting = No vomiting or retching or dry hea n/m = Number of patients with desired response/nu Acute phase: 0 to 24 hours following initiation of c Delayed phase: 25 to 120 hours following initiatioi Overall phase: 0 to 120 hours following initiation c | ry heaves and no use of rescue medication. ves. imber of patients included in time point. hemotherapy. i of chemotherapy. >f chemotherapy. | |
The estimated time to first vomiting after initiation of chemotherapy treatment was longer with the aprepitant regimen (estimated median time to first vomiting was 94.5 hours) compared with the control regimen group (estimated median time to first vomiting was 26.0 hours) as depicted in the Kaplan-Meier curves in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Time to first vomiting episode from start of chemotherapy administration – paediatric patients in the overall phase-Cycle 1 (Intent to treat population)
An analysis of efficacy in subpopulations in Cycle 1 demonstrated that, regardless of age category, gender, use of dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis, and emetogenicity of chemotherapy, the aprepitant regimen provided better control than the control regimen with respect to the complete response endpoints.
5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties
Aprepitant displays non-linear pharmacokinetics. Both clearance and absolute bioavailability decrease with increasing dose.
Absorption
The mean absolute oral bioavailability of aprepitant is 67 % for the 80 mg capsule and 59 % for the 125 mg capsule. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of aprepitant occurred at approximately 4 hours (tmax). Oral administration of the capsule with an approximately 800 Kcal standard breakfast resulted in an up to 40 % increase in AUC of aprepitant. This increase is not considered clinically relevant.
The pharmacokinetics of aprepitant is non-linear across the clinical dose range. In healthy young adults, the increase in AUG)--,, was 26 % greater than dose proportional between 80 mg and 125 mg single doses administered in the fed state.
Following oral administration of a single 125 mg dose of EMEND on Day 1 and 80 mg once daily on Days 2 and 3, the AUGo-24hr (mean±SD) was 19.6 ± 2.5 pg«h/mL and 21.2 ± 6.3 pg«h/mL on Days 1 and 3, respectively. Gmax was 1.6 ± 0.36 pg/mL and 1.4 ± 0.22 pg/mL on Days 1 and 3, respectively.
Distribution
Aprepitant is highly protein bound, with a mean of 97 %. The geometric mean apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) is approximately 66 L in humans.
Biotransformation
Aprepitant undergoes extensive metabolism. In healthy young adults, aprepitant accounts for approximately 19 % of the radioactivity in plasma over 72 hours following a single intravenous administration 100-mg dose of [14G]-fosaprepitant, a prodrug for aprepitant, indicating a substantial presence of metabolites in the plasma. Twelve metabolites of aprepitant have been identified in human plasma. The metabolism of aprepitant occurs largely via oxidation at the morpholine ring and its side chains and the resultant metabolites were only weakly active. In vitro studies using human liver microsomes indicate that aprepitant is metabolised primarily by GYP3A4 and potentially with minor contribution by GYP1A2 and GYP2G19.
Elimination
Aprepitant is not excreted unchanged in urine. Metabolites are excreted in urine and via biliary excretion in faeces. Following a single intravenously administered 100 mg dose of [14G]-fosaprepitant, a prodrug for aprepitant, to healthy subjects, 57 % of the radioactivity was recovered in urine and 45 % in faeces.
The plasma clearance of aprepitant is dose-dependent, decreasing with increased dose and ranged from approximately 60 to 72 mL/min in the therapeutic dose range. The terminal half-life ranged from approximately 9 to 13 hours.
Pharmacokinetics in special populations
Elderly: Following oral administration of a single 125 mg dose of aprepitant on Day 1 and 80 mg once daily on Days 2 through 5, the AUG0–24hr of aprepitant was 21 % higher on Day 1 and 36 % higher on Day 5 in elderly (> 65 years) relative to younger adults. The Gmax was 10 % higher on Day 1 and 24 % higher on Day 5 in elderly relative to younger adults. These differences are not considered clinically meaningful. No dose adjustment for EMEND is necessary in elderly patients.
Gender: Following oral administration of a single 125 mg dose of aprepitant, the Gmax for aprepitant is 16 % higher in females as compared with males. The half-life of aprepitant is 25 % lower in females as compared with males and its tmax occurs at approximately the same time. These differences are not considered clinically meaningful. No dose adjustment for EMEND is necessary based on gender.
Hepatic impairment: Mild hepatic impairment (Ghild-Pugh class A) does not affect the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant to a clinically relevant extent. No dose adjustment is necessary for patients with mild hepatic impairment. Gonclusions regarding the influence of moderate hepatic impairment (Ghild-Pugh class B) on aprepitant pharmacokinetics cannot be drawn from available data.
There are no clinical or pharmacokinetic data in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).
Renal impairment: A single 240 mg dose of aprepitant was administered to patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 mL/min) and to patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis.
In patients with severe renal impairment, the AUCo-» of total aprepitant (unbound and protein bound) decreased by 21 % and Cmax decreased by 32 %, relative to healthy subjects. In patients with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis, the AUC0-» of total aprepitant decreased by 42 % and Cmax decreased by 32 %. Due to modest decreases in protein binding of aprepitant in patients with renal disease, the AUC of pharmacologically active unbound aprepitant was not significantly affected in patients with renal impairment compared with healthy subjects. Haemodialysis conducted 4 or 48 hours after dosing had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant; less than 0.2 % of the dose was recovered in the dialysate.
No dose adjustment for EMEND is necessary for patients with renal impairment or for patients with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis.
Paediatric population : As part of a 3-day regimen, dosing of aprepitant capsules (125/80/80-mg) in adolescent patients (aged 12 through 17 years) achieved an AUCo-24hr above 17 pg*hr/mL on Day 1 with concentrations (Cmin ) at the end of Days 2 and 3 above 0.4 pg/mL in a majority of patients. The median peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was approximately 1.3 pg/mL on Day 1, occurring at approximately 4 hours. As part of a 3-day regimen, dosing of aprepitant powder for oral suspension (3/2/2-mg/kg) in patients aged 6 months to less than 12 years achieved an AUC0–24hr above 17 pg*hr/mL on Day 1 with concentrations (Cmin) at the end of Days 2 and 3 above 0.1 pg/mL in a majority of patients. The median peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was approximately 1.2 pg/mL on Day 1, occurring between 5 and 7 hours.
A population pharmacokinetic analysis of aprepitant in paediatric patients (aged 6 months through 17 years) suggests that gender and race have no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant.
Relationship between concentration and effect
Using a highly specific NK1-receptor tracer, positron emission tomography (PET) studies in healthy young men have shown that aprepitant penetrates into the brain and occupies NK1 receptors in a dose-and plasma-concentration-dependent manner. Aprepitant plasma concentrations achieved with the 3-day regimen of EMEND in adults are predicted to provide greater than 95 % occupancy of brain NK1 receptors.
5.3 Preclinical safety data
Pre-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of single and repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenic potential, toxicity to reproduction and development. However, it should be noted that systemic exposure in rodents was similar or even lower than therapeutic exposure in humans at the 125 mg/80 mg dose. In particular, although no adverse effects were noted in reproduction studies at human exposure levels, the animal exposures are not sufficient to make an adequate risk assessment in man.
In a juvenile toxicity study in rats treated from postnatal day 10 to day 63 aprepitant led to an earlier vaginal opening in females from 250 mg/kg b.i.d. and to a delayed preputial separation in males, from 10 mg/kg b.i.d. There were no margins to clinically relevant exposure. There were no treatment-related effects on mating, fertility or embryonic/foetal survival, and no pathological changes in the reproductive organs. In a juvenile toxicity study in dogs treated from postnatal day 14 to day 42, a decreased testicular weight and Leydig cell size were seen in the males at 6 mg/kg/day and increased uterine weight, hypertrophy of the uterus and cervix, and oedema of vaginal tissues were seen in females from 4 mg/kg/day. There were no margins to clinically relevant exposure of aprepitant. For short term treatment according to recommended dose regimen these findings are considered unlikely to be clinically relevant.
6. PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS6.1 List of excipients
Capsule content
Sucrose
Microcrystalline cellulose (E 460)
Hydroxypropylcellulose (E 463)
Sodium laurilsulfate
Capsule shell (125 mg)
Gelatin
Titanium dioxide (E 171)
Red iron oxide (E 172)
Yellow iron oxide (E 172)
Capsule shell (80 mg)
Gelatin
Titanium dioxide (E 171)
Printing ink
Shellac
Potassium hydroxide
Black iron oxide (E 172)
6.2 Incompatibilities
Not applicable.
-
6.3 Shelf-life
4 years
6.4 Special precautions for storage
Store in the original package in order to protect from moisture.
6.5 Nature and contents of container
Different pack sizes including different strengths are available.
Aluminium blister containing one 80 mg capsule.
Aluminium blister containing two 80 mg capsules.
-
5 Aluminium blisters each containing one 80 mg capsule.
Aluminium blister containing one 125 mg capsule.
-
5 Aluminium blisters each containing one 125 mg capsule.
Aluminium blister containing one 125 mg capsule and two 80 mg capsules.
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.
6.6 Special precautions for disposal
No special requirements for disposal.
7. MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDER
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V.
Waarderweg 39
2031 BN Haarlem
The Netherlands
8. MARKETING AUTHORISATION NUMBER
EU/1/03/262/001
EU/1/03/262/002
EU/1/03/262/003
EU/1/03/262/004
EU/1/03/262/005
EU/1/03/262/006
9. DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION/RENEWAL OF AUTHORISATION
Date of first authorisation: 11 November 2003
Date of latest renewal: 22 September 2008