Patient info Open main menu

E MGALITY 120 MG - SOLUTION FOR INJECTION PRE-FILLED SYRINGE - summary of medicine characteristics

Contains active substance :

Dostupné balení:

Summary of medicine characteristics - E MGALITY 120 MG - SOLUTION FOR INJECTION PRE-FILLED SYRINGE

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions.

1 NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT

Emgality 120 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe

2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

Each pre-filled syringe contains 120 mg of galcanezumab in 1 mL.

Galcanezumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody produced in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells.

For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

3 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM

Solution for injection (injection).

The solution is clear and colourless to slightly yellow.

4 CLINICAL PARTICULARS

4.1 Therapeutic indications

Emgality is indicated for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults who have at least 4 migraine days per month.

4.2 Posology and method of administration

Treatment should be initiated by physicians experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of migraine.

Posology

The recommended dose is 120 mg galcanezumab injected subcutaneously once monthly, with a 240 mg loading dose as the initial dose.

Patients should be instructed to inject a missed dose as soon as possible and then resume monthly dosing.

The treatment benefit should be assessed within 3 months after initiation of treatment. Any further decision to continue treatment should be taken on an individual patient basis. Evaluation of the need to continue treatment is recommended regularly thereafter.

Elderly (> 65 years)

Galcanezumab has not been studied in elderly patients. No dose adjustment is required as the pharmacokinetics of galcanezumab are not affected by age.

Renal impairment/hepatic impairment

No dose adjustment is required in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment or hepatic impairment (see section 5.2).

Paediatric population

The safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in children aged 6 to 18 years have not yet been established. No data are available.

There is no relevant use of galcanezumab in children below the age of 6 years for the prevention of migraine.

Method of administration

Subcutaneous use.

A patient may self-inject galcanezumab by following the Instructions for Use. Galcanezumab is to be injected subcutaneously in the abdomen, thigh, back of the upper arm, or in the gluteal region. After training, patients may self-inject galcanezumab if a healthcare professional determines that it is appropriate. Comprehensive instructions for administration are given in the Package Leaflet.

4.3 Contraindications

Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.

4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use

Traceability

In order to improve the traceability of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch number of the administered product should be clearly recorded.

Cardiovascular risk

Patients with certain major cardiovascular diseases were excluded from clinical studies (see section 5.1). No safety data are available in these patients.

Serious hypersensitivity

Serious hypersensitivity reactions including cases of anaphylaxis, angioedema and urticaria have been reported. If a serious hypersensitivity reaction occurs, administration of galcanezumab should be discontinued immediately and appropriate therapy initiated. Serious hypersensitivity reactions may occur within 1 day after galcanezumab administration, however cases with a delayed onset have also been reported.

Excipients

This medicinal product contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per 120 mg dose, i.e., is essentially “sodium-free”.

4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

No drug interaction studies were conducted. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions are expected based on the characteristics of galcanezumab.

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Pregnancy

There are limited data from the use of galcanezumab in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3). Human immunoglobulin (IgG) is known to cross the placental barrier. As a precautionary measure, it is preferable to avoid the use of galcanezumab during pregnancy.

Breast-feeding

It is unknown whether galcanezumab is excreted in human milk. Human IgG is known to be excreted in breast milk during the first days after birth, which is decreasing to low concentrations soon afterwards; consequently, a risk to breast-fed infants cannot be excluded during this short period. Afterwards, use of galcanezumab could be considered during breast-feeding only if clinically needed.

Fertility

The effect of galcanezumab on human fertility has not been evaluated. Fertility studies in animals do not indicate harmful effects with respect to male and female fertility (see section 5.3).

4.7 Effects on ability to drive and use machines

Galcanezumab may have a minor influence on the ability to drive and use machines.

Vertigo may occur following the administration of galcanezumab (see section 4.8).

4.8 Undesirable effects

Summary of the safety profile

Over 2500 patients were exposed to galcanezumab in clinical studies in migraine prophylaxis. Over 1400 patients were exposed to galcanezumab during the doubleblind treatment phase of the placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. 279 patients were exposed for 12 months.

The reported adverse drug reactions for 120 mg and 240 mg were injection site pain (10.1 %/11.6 %), injection site reactions (9.9 %/14.5 %), vertigo (0.7 %/1.2 %), constipation (1.0 %/1.5 %), pruritus (0.7 %/1.2 %) and urticaria (0.3 %/0.1 %). Most of the reactions were mild or moderate in severity. Less than 2.5 % of patients in these studies discontinued due to adverse events.

Tabulated list of adverse reactions

Table 1. List of adverse reactions in clinical studies

Frequency estimate: Very common (> 1/10), common (> 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (> 1/1,000 to < 1/100).

System Organ

Class

Very common

Common

Uncommon

Ear and Labyrinth System

Vertigo

Gastrointestinal

System

Constipation

Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue

Pruritus

Urticaria

General disorders and administration site conditions

Injection site pain

Injection site reactions3

a Most frequently reported terms (> 1 %) were: Injection site reaction, Injection site erythema, Injection site pruritus, Injection site bruising, Injection site swelling.

Description of selected adverse reactions

Injection site pain or reactions

The majority of events related to the injection site were mild to moderate and less than 0.5 % of patients exposed to galcanezumab during the phase 3 studies discontinued the treatment due to an injection site reaction. The majority of injection site reactions were reported within 1 day and on average resolved within 5 days. In 86 % of the patients reporting injection site pain, the event occurred within 1 hour of injection and resolved on average in 1 day. One percent of the patients exposed to galcanezumab during the phase 3 studies experienced severe pain at the injection site.

Urticaria

While urticaria is uncommon, serious cases of urticaria have been reported in galcanezumab clinical studies.

Immunogenicity

In the clinical studies, the incidence of anti-drug antibody development during the double-blind treatment phase was 4.8 % in patients receiving galcanezumab once monthly (all but one of whom had in vitro neutralizing activity). With 12 months of treatment, up to 12.5 % of galcanezumab-treated patients developed anti-drug antibodies, most of which were of low titre and tested positive for neutralising activity in vitro. However, the presence of anti-drug antibodies did not affect the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety of galcanezumab.

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Yellow Card Scheme; Website: www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow Card in the Google Play or Apple App Store.

4.9 Overdose

4.9 Overdose

Doses up to 600 mg have been administered subcutaneously to humans without doselimiting toxicity. In case of an overdose, it is recommended that the patient be monitored for any signs or symptoms of adverse reactions and appropriate symptomatic treatment be instituted immediately.

5 PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

5 PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: analgesics, other antimigraine preparations, ATC code: N02CX08

Mechanism of action

Galcanezumab is a humanised IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) thus preventing its biological activity. Elevated blood concentrations of CGRP have been associated with migraine attacks. Galcanezumab binds to CGRP with high affinity (KD = 31 pM) and high specificity (> 10,000-fold vs related peptides adrenomedullin, amylin, calcitonin and intermedin).

Clinical efficacy and safety

The efficacy and safety of galcanezumab has been studied in 3 phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies in adult patients (N = 2886). The 2 episodic migraine studies (EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2) enrolled patients who met International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria for a diagnosis of migraine with or without aura with 4–14 migraine headache days per month. The chronic migraine study (REGAIN) enrolled patients who met ICHD criteria for chronic migraine with > 15 headache days per month, of which at least 8 had the features of migraine. Patients with recent acute cardiovascular events (including MI, unstable angina, CABG, stroke, DVT) and/or those deemed to be at serious cardiovascular risk were excluded from the galcanezumab clinical trials. Patients > 65 years of age were also excluded.

Patients received placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/month (with an initial loading dose of 240 mg for the first month) or galcanezumab 240 mg/month and were allowed to use medication for the acute treatment of migraine. Across the 3 studies, patients were predominantly female (> 83 %) with a mean age of 41 years, and an average migraine history of 20 to 21 years. Approximately one-third of patients across the studies had at least 1 prior failure on a migraine prophylactic treatment for efficacy reasons and approximately 16 % of patients across the studies had at least 2 prior failure on a prophylactic treatment for efficacy reasons.

In all 3 studies, the overall mean change from baseline in number of monthly Migraine Headache Days (MHDs) was the primary efficacy measure. Response rate is the mean percentage of patients meeting a defined threshold in the reduction of the number of monthly MHDs (> 50 %, > 75 % and 100 %) across the double-blind treatment period. The impact of migraine on functioning was assessed by the Role Function-Restrictive domain of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1, and by the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire. The MSQ measures impact of migraine on work or daily activities, relationships with family and friends, leisure time, productivity, concentration, energy, and tiredness. Scoring ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less impairment , that is, patients experience fewer restrictions on the performance of dayto-day activities. For the MIDAS, higher scores indicate more disability. The baseline scores of the MIDAS reflected severe migraine related disability of patients in EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 (mean of 33.1) and a very severely disabled population (mean of 67.2) in REGAIN.

Episodic migraine

Studies EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 had a 6 month, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period. Completion rate of the double-blind treatment phase for patients who received galcanezumab ranged from 82.8 % to 87.7 %.

Both galcanezumab 120 mg and 240 mg treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements from baseline compared to placebo on mean change in MHD (see Table 2). Patients treated with galcanezumab had greater response rates and greater reductions in the number of monthly MHDs that acute medication was taken compared with placebo-treated patients. Galcanezumab-treated patients had a greater improvement in functioning (as measured by the MSQ Role Function-Restrictive domain score) compared with placebo-treated patients, beginning at month 1. More patients treated with galcanezumab achieved clinically significant levels of improvement in functioning (responder rate based on MSQ Role Function Restrictive domain) compared with those treated with placebo. Galcanezumab was associated with a statistically significant reduction in disability over placebo.

Compared with placebo-treated patients, patients treated with galcanezumab 120 mg or 240 mg had significantly greater mean decreases from baseline in the number of monthly MHDs at month 1 and at all subsequent months up to month 6 (see Figure 1). Additionally, in month 1, patients treated with galcanezumab (loading dose of 240 mg) demonstrated significantly fewer weekly MHDs compared with placebo-treated patients, at week 1 and each subsequent week.

Figure 1 Reduction in monthly migraine headache days over time in studies EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2

Migraine Headache Days Mean Change from Baseline (SE)

Table 2. Efficacy and patient reported outcome measures

EVOLVE-1 – Episodic Migraine

EVOLVE-2 – Episodic Migraine

Emgality

Placebo

N = 425

Emgality

Placebo

N = 450

120 mg

N = 210

240 mg

N = 208

120 mg

N = 226

240 mg

N = 220

Efficacy Outcomesa

MHD

Baseline

9.21

9.14

9.08

9.07

9.06

9.19

Mean Change

–4.73

–4.57

–2.81

–4.29

–4.18

–2.28

Treatment Difference

–1.92

–1.76

–2.02

–1.90

CI95 %

(-2.48, –1.37)

(-2.31, –1.20)

(-2.55, –1.48)

(-2.44, –1.36)

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

> 50 % MHD Responders

Percentage, %

62.3

60.9

38.6

59.3

56.5

36.0

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

> 75 % MHD Responders

Percentage, %

38.8

38.5

19.3

33.5

34.3

17.8

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

100 % Responers

Percentage, %

15.6

14.6

6.2

11.5

13.8

5.7

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

MHD with Acute

Medication Use

Baseline

7.42

7.34

7.38

7.47

7.47

7.62

Mean Change

–3.96

–3.76

–2.15

–3.67

–3.63

–1.85

Treatment Difference

–1.81

–1.61

–1.82

–1.78

CI95 %

(-2.28, –1.33)

(-2.09, –1.14)

(-2.29, –1.36)

(-2.25, –1.31)

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

Patient-reported Outcome Measures

MSQ Role Function-

Restrictive Domainb

N

189

184

377

213

210

396

Baseline

51.39

48.76

52.92

52.47

51.71

51.35

Mean Change

32.43

32.09

24.69

28.47

27.04

19.65

Treatment Difference

7.74

7.40

8.82

7.39

CI95 %

(5.20, 10.28)

(4.83, 9.97)

(6.33, 11.31)

(4.88, 9.90)

P-value

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

<.001d

MSQ Role Function

Restrictive Domain

Respondersc

N

189

184

377

213

210

396

Percentage, %

63.5

69.6

47.2

58.2

60.0

43.4

P-value

<.001f

<.001f

<.001f

<.001f

MIDAS Total Scoree

N

177

170

345

202

194

374

Baseline

32.93

36.09

31.84

30.87

32.75

34.25

Mean Change

–21.16

–20.06

–14.87

–21.17

–20.24

–12.02

Treatment Difference

–6.29

–5.19

–9.15

–8.22

CI95%

(-9.45, –3.13)

(-8.39, –1.98)

(-12.61, –5.69)

(-11.71, –4.72)

P-value

<.001f

.002f

<.001f

<.001f

N = number of patients; CI95 % = 95 % confidence interval.

aEfficacy outcomes were evaluated across Months 1–6.

bEvaluated across Months 4–6.

cDefined as those with an improvement of > 25 points for Episodic Migraine at Months 4–6 average.

dStatistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

eEvaluated at Month 6.

fNot adjusted for multiple comparisons.

In pooled data from studies EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2, in patients who failed one or more prophylactic treatments for efficacy reasons, the treatment difference for the reduction of mean monthly MHDs observed between galcanezumab 120 mg and placebo was –2.69 days (p < 0.001) and between galcanezumab240 mg and placebo -.78 days (p < 0.001). In patients failing two or more prophylactic treatments, the treatment difference was –2.64 days (p < 0.001) between 120 mg and placebo and –3.04 days (p < 0.001) between240 mg and placebo.

Chronic Migraine

Study REGAIN had a 3 month, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period followed by a 9 month open-label extension. Approximately 15 % of the patients continued concurrent treatment with topiramate or propranolol as allowed by the protocol for prophylaxis of migraine. Completion rate of the double-blind treatment phase for patients who received galcanezumab was 95.3 %.

Both galcanezumab 120 mg and240 mg treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements from baseline compared to placebo on mean change in MHD (see Table 3). Patients treated with galcanezumab had greater response rates and greater reductions in the number of monthly MHDs that acute medication was taken compared with placebo-treated patients. Galcanezumab-treated patients had a greater improvement in functioning (as measured by the MSQ Role Function-Restrictive domain score) compared with placebo-treated patients, beginning at month 1. More patients treated with galcanezumab achieved clinically significant levels of improvement in functioning (responder rate based on MSQ Role Function Restrictive domain) compared with those treated with placebo. The 120 mg dose was associated with a statistically significant reduction in disability over placebo.

Compared with placebo-treated patients, patients treated with galcanezumab 120 mg or240 mg had significantly greater mean decreases from baseline in the number of monthly MHDs at at the first month and at all subsequent months up to month 3 (see Figure2). Additionally, in month 1, patients treated with galcanezumab (loading dose of240 mg) demonstrated significantly fewer weekly MHDs compared with placebo-treated patients, at week 1 and each subsequent week.

Figure 2 Reduction in monthly migraine headache days over time in study REGAIN

Study REGAIN (Chronic Migraine)

Migraine Headache Days Mean Change from Baseline (SE)

Months

Placebo

EMGALITY 120 mg

EMGALITY 240 mg

pc.001 at all months for both GfeiB 12–3 mg and 240 mg earrpaiwi with placebo except p=.002 at month 2 far GMB 240 mg compered with place bo

Table 3. Efficacy and patient reported outcome measures

REGAIN – Chronic Migraine

Emgality

Placebo

N = 538

120 mg

N = 273

240 mg

N = 274

Efficacy Outcomesa

MHD

Baseline

19.36

19.17

19.55

Mean Change

–4.83

–4.62

–2.74

Treatment Difference

–2.09

–1.88

CI95 %

(-2.92, –1.26)

(-2.71, –1.05)

P-value

<.001c

<.001c

5 50 % MHD Responders

Percentage, %

27.6

27.5

15.4

P-value

<.001c

<.001c

7 75 % MHD Responders

Percentage, %

7.0

8.8

4.5

P-value

.031d

<.001c

100 % Responders

Percentage, %

0.7

1.3

0.5

P-value

>.05d

>.05d

MHD with Acute Medication Use

Baseline

15.12

14.49

15.51

Mean Change

–4.74

–4.25

–2.23

Treatment Difference

–2.51

–2.01

CI95 %

(-3.27, –1.76)

(-2.77, –1.26)

P-value

<.001d

<.001 c

Patient-reported Outcome Measures'3

MSQ Role Function-Restrictive

Domain

N

252

253

494

Baseline

39.29

38.93

38.37

Mean Change

21.81

23.05

16.76

Treatment Difference

5.06

6.29

CI95 %

(2.12, 7.99)

(3.03, 9.55)

P-value

<.001d

<.001c

MSQ Role Function Restrictive

Domain Responders

N

252

253

494

Percentage, %

64.3

64.8

54.1

P-value

.003e

.002e

MIDAS Total Score

N

254

258

504

Baseline

62.46

69.17

68.66

Mean Change

–20.27

–17.02

–11.53

Treatment Difference

–8.74

–5.49

CI95 %

(-16.39, –1.08)

(-13.10, 2.12)

P-value

.025e

>.05e

N = number of patients; CI95 % = 95 % confidence interval.

aEfficacy outcomes were evaluated across Months 1–3.

bPatient- reported outcomes were evaluated at Month 3. MSQ role function restrictive domain responders were defined as those with an improvement of > 17.14 points for Chronic Migraine at Month 3.

cStatisti cally significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. dNot statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. eNot adjusted for multiple comparisons.

In patients who failed one or more prophylactic treatments for efficacy reasons, the treatment difference for the reduction of mean monthly MHDs observed between galcanezumab 120 mg and placebo was –3.54 days (p < 0.001) and between galcanezumab 240 mg and placebo –1.37 days (p < 0.05). In patients failing two or more prophylactic treatments, the treatment difference was –4.48 days (p < 0.001) between 120 mg and placebo and –1.86 days (p < 0.01) between 240 mg and placebo.

Sixty-four percent of the patients had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. In this patients, the treatment difference observed between galcanezumab 120 mg and placebo and between galcanezumab 240 mg and placebo for the reduction of MHDs in these patients was respectively –2.53 days (p < 0.001) and –2.26 days (p < 0.001).

Long term efficacy

Efficacy was sustained for up to 1 year in an open-label study in which patients with either episodic or chronic migraine (with an average baseline of 10.6 monthly MHDs) received galcanezumab 120 mg/month (with an initial loading dose of 240 mg for the first month) or galcanezumab 240 mg/month. 77.8 % of patients completed the treatment period. The overall mean reduction from baseline in the number of monthly MHDs averaged over the treatment phase was 5.6 days for the 120 mg dose group and 6.5 days for the 240 mg dose group. Over 72 % of patients completing the study reported a 50 % reduction in MHDs at month 12. In pooled data from studies EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2, more than 19 % of the patients treated with galcanezumab maintained a > 50 % response from Month 1 to Month 6 versus 8 % of the patients on placebo (p < 0.001).

Paediatric population

The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with galcanezumab in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).

5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties

Absorption

Based on a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, following a loading dose of 240 mg the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of galcanezumab was approximately 30 jig/mL (27 % coefficient of variation, (CV)) and the time to Cmax was 5 days postdose.

Monthly doses of 120 mg or 240 mg achieved a steady-state Cmax (Cmax, ss) of approximately 28 jig/mL (35 % CV) or 54 jig/mL (31 % CV), respectively. The galcanezumab Cmax, ss at monthly doses of 120 mg is achieved after the 240 mg loading dose.

Injection site location (abdomen, thigh, buttocks and arm) did not significantly influence the absorption of galcanezumab.

Distribution

Based on a population PK analysis, the apparent volume of distribution of galcanezumab was 7.3 L.

Biotransformation

As a humanised IgG4 monoclonal antibody, galcanezumab is expected to be degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways in the same manner as endogenous IgG.

Elimination

Based on a population PK analysis, the apparent clearance of galcanezumab was approximately 0.008 L/hour and the half life of galcanezumab was 27 days.

Linearity/non-linearity

Galcanezumab exposure increases proportionally with dose.

Based on a population PK analysis that included doses ranging from 5 – 300 mg, the rate of absorption, apparent clearance and apparent volume of distribution was independent of dose.

Age, sex, weight, race, ethnicity

No dose adjustment is needed on the basis of age (18 to 65 years), sex, weight, race or ethnicity as there was no clinically meaningful effect of these factors on the apparent clearance or apparent volume of distribution of galcanezumab.

Renal or hepatic impairment

Specific clinical pharmacology studies to evaluate the effects of renal impairment and hepatic impairment on the PK of galcanezumab have not been conducted. Renal elimination of IgG monoclonal antibody is low. Similarly, IgG monoclonal antibodies are mainly eliminated via intracellular catabolism and hepatic impairment is not expected to influence the clearance of galcanezumab. Based on a population PK analysis, bilirubin concentration or Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (range: 24 to 308 mL/min) did not significantly influence the apparent clearance of galcanezumab.

5.3 Preclinical safety data

6   PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS

6.1 List of excipients

L-histidine

L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate

Polysorbate 80

Sodium chloride

Water for injections

6.2 Incompatibilities

Not applicable.

6.3 Shelf life

2 years

6.4 Special precautions for storage

Store in a refrigerator (2 °C – 8 °C).

Do not freeze.

Store in the original package in order to protect from light.

Emgality may be stored unrefrigerated for up to 7 days when stored at temperatures up to 30 °C. If these conditions are exceeded, the pre-filled syringe must be discarded.

6.5 Nature and contents of container

1 mL of solution in a type I clear glass single-dose syringe. Pack sizes of 1, 2 or

3 pre-filled syringes. Not all pack sizes may be marketed.

The needle included in the pack is only suitable for sub-cutaneous injection.

6.6 Special precautions for disposal

6.6 Special precautions for disposal

Instructions for use

The instructions for using the syringe included with the Package Leaflet, must be followed carefully. The pre-filled syringe is for total use only.

The pre-filled syringe should be inspected visually prior to administration. Emgality should not be used if the solution is cloudy, discoloured or contains particles, or if any part of the device appears to be damaged.

Do not shake.

Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.